Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems 2018
DOI: 10.5220/0006960201070114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning in EMG-based Gesture Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsinganos et al [15] achieve 89.8% classification accuracy on the 53 classes of NinaPro DB1 with an RMSfed TCN. This result is 4.8% better than SoA [39] and surpasses by 19.3% the previous results from the same authors obtained with conventional 2d-CNNs [28]. This TCN was evaluated using receptive field (i.e., input sequence lengths) of 300 ms up to 2.5 s. Although the NinaPro DB1 dataset is not multi-session [9] and so does not involve the temporal variability which is the focus of this work, [15] is a valuable demonstration that TCNs can yield good accuracy on this task.…”
Section: B Related Workcontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsinganos et al [15] achieve 89.8% classification accuracy on the 53 classes of NinaPro DB1 with an RMSfed TCN. This result is 4.8% better than SoA [39] and surpasses by 19.3% the previous results from the same authors obtained with conventional 2d-CNNs [28]. This TCN was evaluated using receptive field (i.e., input sequence lengths) of 300 ms up to 2.5 s. Although the NinaPro DB1 dataset is not multi-session [9] and so does not involve the temporal variability which is the focus of this work, [15] is a valuable demonstration that TCNs can yield good accuracy on this task.…”
Section: B Related Workcontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…All of them share a typical structure, based on i) an analog front end for bio-potential acquisition, ii) a data preprocessing and feature extraction/selection step, and iii) a final classification back end. Moreover, they usually all rely on Machine Learning (ML) algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), LDA or artificial neural networks (ANN) [8], [9], [27], [10], [13], [28].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang [17] utilized spectrogram in conjunction with a CNN-LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory network) combination and showed improved classification (from 77.167% to 79.329%) on the NinaPro dataset. Tsinganos [18] proposed a modified CNN and achieved an improvement of 3% on NinaPro dataset. Pinzón-Arenas [19] used CNN to recognize six hand gestures using a wearable EMG recording device (Myo Armband, Thalamic Labs) and achieved a validation accuracy of 98.4% and 99% testing accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-mentioned methods are evaluated by measuring the improvement of classification accuracy for two CNN architectures. These are a modified version of the simple model of [ 13 ] denoted as AtzoriNet* described in [ 22 ], and an implementation of the bigger network of [ 19 ] called WeiNet to evaluate how well augmentation works in overparameterized networks. Details of the models can be seen in Table A1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%