2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning in Environmental Toxicology: Current Progress and Open Challenges

Haoyue Tan,
Jinsha Jin,
Chao Fang
et al.

Abstract: Ubiquitous chemicals in the environment may pose a threat to human health and the ecosystem, so comprehensive toxicity information must be obtained. Due to the inability of traditional experimental methods to meet the needs of toxicity testing of a large number of chemicals, in vivo and in vitro assays have been shifted to a new paradigm, computer-assisted virtual screening. However, the commonly used virtual screening techniques, including read-across and machine learning-based quantitative structure−activity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning (ML) algorithms have also been used in IVIVE, which involves screening or predicting in vivo toxicity by combining chemical structure characterization information with in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assay data. , However, ML models have inherent limitations, with one key issue being the limited interpretability associated with “black box” methodologies. To address this limitation, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework has been utilized to provide a theoretical basis for IVIVE and enhance the predictive capabilities of ML algorithms. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) algorithms have also been used in IVIVE, which involves screening or predicting in vivo toxicity by combining chemical structure characterization information with in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assay data. , However, ML models have inherent limitations, with one key issue being the limited interpretability associated with “black box” methodologies. To address this limitation, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework has been utilized to provide a theoretical basis for IVIVE and enhance the predictive capabilities of ML algorithms. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The special issue includes several review articles encompassing a wide spectrum, ranging from a historical perspective of water data to computational modeling in wastewater treatment to ML modeling of environmental chemical reactions, environmental toxicology, heavy metal removal, and cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) . One significant application of these innovative tools is ML-assisted environmental monitoring, which can address diverse problems, such as predicting effluent nutrients or influent flow rates and nutrient loads at wastewater treatment plants, , formation of disinfection byproducts, drivers of the accumulation of potentially toxic elements in sediments, greenhouse gas emissions, , occurrence of PFAS, water quality assessment, microplastics, microcystins, and differentiation of landfill leachate and domestic sludge .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%