2023
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Methods for Interpretation of Pulmonary CT and X-ray Images in Patients with COVID-19-Related Lung Involvement: A Systematic Review

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus that has been affecting the global population by spreading rapidly and causing severe complications, which require prompt and elaborate emergency treatment. Automatic tools to diagnose COVID-19 could potentially be an important and useful aid. Radiologists and clinicians could potentially rely on interpretable AI technologies to address the diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19 patients. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the state-of-the-art deep learning techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite radiomics being derived from images, understanding the significance of calculations is crucial. As the field progresses into deep-learning parameters, the challenge shifts to providing interpretative tools like heat maps [51,52] for a comprehensive understanding.…”
Section: Biomarker Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite radiomics being derived from images, understanding the significance of calculations is crucial. As the field progresses into deep-learning parameters, the challenge shifts to providing interpretative tools like heat maps [51,52] for a comprehensive understanding.…”
Section: Biomarker Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training of our model involved a comprehensive dataset of annotated X-ray images, including diverse cases of COVID-19 pneumonia, other pneumonia types, and healthy lungs, ensuring robustness and generalizability [10]. The model's performance in preliminary tests was notable, achieving higher accuracy rates compared to existing pneumonia classification models, a critical factor in clinical settings where diagnostic precision is paramount [11]. False negatives in this context can lead to delayed treatment and increased transmission risk, while false positives can result in unnecessary interventions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%