2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05376-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning of individual aesthetics

Abstract: Accurate evaluation of human aesthetic preferences represents a major challenge for creative evolutionary and generative systems research. Prior work has tended to focus on feature measures of the artefact, such as symmetry, complexity and coherence. However, research models from Psychology suggest that human aesthetic experiences encapsulate factors beyond the artefact, making accurate computational models very difficult to design. The interactive genetic algorithm (IGA) circumvents the problem through human-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Complexity measures, carefully chosen for specific styles or types of generative art can capture some broad aspects of personal aesthetic judgement, but they are insufficient alone to fully replace human judgement and discretion. Using other techniques, such as deep learning, may result in slightly better correlation to individual human judgement [33], however such systems require training on large datsets which can be tedious and time-consuming for the artist and still do not do as well as the trained artist's eye in resolving aesthetic decisions.…”
Section: Aesthetic Judgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity measures, carefully chosen for specific styles or types of generative art can capture some broad aspects of personal aesthetic judgement, but they are insufficient alone to fully replace human judgement and discretion. Using other techniques, such as deep learning, may result in slightly better correlation to individual human judgement [33], however such systems require training on large datsets which can be tedious and time-consuming for the artist and still do not do as well as the trained artist's eye in resolving aesthetic decisions.…”
Section: Aesthetic Judgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we usually have a limited number of training samples with human-labeled aesthetic scores, it is not practical to learn the feature extractor from scratch. Thus we start from a pre-trained ResNet [15] for its proven ability to learn robust image representations that show ever-improving performance in the task of aesthetic evaluation [17,36,37]. Feature maps extracted by the CNN are fed into attribute score estimators ,which output attribute scores.…”
Section: Aesthetic Evaluation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the computational aesthetic evaluation is to simulate the visual system and human perception to make an aesthetic judgment about the images automatically [ 10 ]. In recent years, many researchers from different fields of knowledge, such as Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, Arts or Design, have focused on the identification of the characteristics most related to human aesthetic preferences, as well as on the modelling of computer systems to recreate human evaluations for classification and prediction tasks [ 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%