2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.054046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning of Multiresolution X-Ray Micro-Computed-Tomography Images for Multiscale Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resolution recovery networks were then trained using a modification of well-established image-to-image regression techniques [7], [8], with loss functions, network structures and data augmentation tailored to the 3D tomographic imaging problem, modified to ensure rapid convergence and high performance even with early stopping [9]. Network structures were adapted from the U-Net architecture [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolution recovery networks were then trained using a modification of well-established image-to-image regression techniques [7], [8], with loss functions, network structures and data augmentation tailored to the 3D tomographic imaging problem, modified to ensure rapid convergence and high performance even with early stopping [9]. Network structures were adapted from the U-Net architecture [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-frequency information can be well preserved by introducing deep learning methods, which are widely used in nature images, medical images, satellite aerial images, military fields, and robotics [2][3][4][5]. This is also true in the field of geophysics [6][7][8][9][10]. However, the traditional pixel loss function in deep learning methods often results in the generated images looking too smooth and lacking details, which predisposes them to being less capable of reconstructing texture in high-frequency images such as thin slices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced multi-component studies suffer from small fields of view (1.5 mm 2 ) or poor voxel resolution (5 μm) issues 68 , 69 (see Supplementary Table 1b ). Similarly, memory scaling limitations in 3D super-resolution (4 times super-resolution results in 64 times memory increase) have restricted its applications to the generation of small super-resolved cubes for analysis and upscaling 20 , 70 . Therefore, although large-scale high-resolution imaging and multi-label simulations of PEMFCs are necessary to drive the next technological innovation, the domain size is currently restricted by limitations in both experimental imaging and computational modelling resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%