2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning prediction of axillary lymph node status using ultrasound images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun et al. reported an AUC of 0.72 (SD ± 0.08) in predicting ALNM from US images using a deep learning technique in the test dataset ( 28 ). However, practical applications of AI are still being implemented in daily radiology practice ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al. reported an AUC of 0.72 (SD ± 0.08) in predicting ALNM from US images using a deep learning technique in the test dataset ( 28 ). However, practical applications of AI are still being implemented in daily radiology practice ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, complementary methods may be used to increase sensitivity and for a complete preoperative assessment of the axillary nodal status [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Utility of deep learning models for prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis has already been proven in ultrasound images and also in breast MRI [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. In these studies, deep learning models were used for binary classification to determine if axillary lymph node metastasis was present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between CNNs and traditional ML methods (random forests) was made in another study performed on 479 breast cancer patients with 2395 breast ultrasound images [ 37 ]. Moreover, the study focused on different parts of US images, where intratumoral, peritumoral and combined regions were utilized to train and evaluate the models.…”
Section: Studies Using Radiomics For Breast Cancer Lymph Node Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the study focused on different parts of US images, where intratumoral, peritumoral and combined regions were utilized to train and evaluate the models. CNNs performed better than random forests in all modalities ( p < 0.05), and combining intratumoral and peritumoral regions yielded the best result (AUC = 0.912 [0.834–99.0]) ( Table 2 ) [ 37 ]. Confidence intervals were reported, but it was not stated by which method they were obtained.…”
Section: Studies Using Radiomics For Breast Cancer Lymph Node Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%