2021
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2993528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors implemented a multi-class DL algorithm with ordinal encoding incorporating both T2W and ADC images. Vente and colleagues described a 2D DL segmentation approach in which zonal masks were implemented along mpMRI [93]. Their work assigned different classes to lesions according to the probability of the output layer, with a higher ISUP group correlating to a higher probability.…”
Section: Multi-class Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors implemented a multi-class DL algorithm with ordinal encoding incorporating both T2W and ADC images. Vente and colleagues described a 2D DL segmentation approach in which zonal masks were implemented along mpMRI [93]. Their work assigned different classes to lesions according to the probability of the output layer, with a higher ISUP group correlating to a higher probability.…”
Section: Multi-class Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work assigned different classes to lesions according to the probability of the output layer, with a higher ISUP group correlating to a higher probability. A quadratic-weighted kappa score of 0.13 was achieved, indicating the still difficult task for lesion detection combined with grading [93].…”
Section: Multi-class Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used SegNet and achieved comparable or superior results for PCa autosegmentation (DSC of 0.52) to those achieved in other studies using bpMRI or mpMRI (DSCs of 0.37-0.46) [34][35][36]. Our study achieved a result (AUC of 0.9) comparable to that achieved by other studies (AUCs of 0.84 [30] and 0.94 [14]) that used the AUC to determine the performance of PCa detection for the dataset and combination of images adopted in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Network ensembles have been shown to create more robust results than single networks 58 , 59 . They leverage different minima that CNNs can obtain because networks are subject to randomness during training.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%