2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning reveals untapped information for local white-matter fiber reconstruction in diffusion-weighted MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D. Tournier et al 2008; Ben Jeurissen et al 2014), or use a statistical model for different compartments (Scherrer et al 2016; Pasternak et al 2009; De Luca, Bertoldo, and Froeling 2017), which can be defined a-priori or driven from the data (Keil et al 2017; De Luca et al 2018). Besides these “classical” approaches to model dMRI, the last couple of years have witnessed a vast increase in the number of machine learning techniques applied to dMRI to predict signal decay (Golkov et al 2016; Grussu et al 2020), fibre orientations (Poulin et al 2019; Nath, Schilling, et al 2019) or the underlying tissue parameters (Nedjati-Gilani et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D. Tournier et al 2008; Ben Jeurissen et al 2014), or use a statistical model for different compartments (Scherrer et al 2016; Pasternak et al 2009; De Luca, Bertoldo, and Froeling 2017), which can be defined a-priori or driven from the data (Keil et al 2017; De Luca et al 2018). Besides these “classical” approaches to model dMRI, the last couple of years have witnessed a vast increase in the number of machine learning techniques applied to dMRI to predict signal decay (Golkov et al 2016; Grussu et al 2020), fibre orientations (Poulin et al 2019; Nath, Schilling, et al 2019) or the underlying tissue parameters (Nedjati-Gilani et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge included a rich dataset acquired with many combinations of gradient strengths, durations and diffusion times and the goal was to predict unseen shells with parameter values within the range used for the provided data. Since the end of this challenge, many novel approaches have been proposed, including a booming application of machine learning techniques for data fitting and prediction (Golkov et al 2016; Nedjati-Gilani et al 2017; Nath, Schilling, et al 2019; Ravi et al 2019; Poulin et al 2019). Moreover, previous challenges (Uran Ferizi et al 2017; Schilling et al 2019; Pizzolato et al 2020) included only diffusion data acquired with standard SDE sequences, and do not provide any insight into the different approaches available to analyse advanced sequences such as DDE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The b-table was checked using an automatic quality control routine to ensure its accuracy. 16 To obtain the spin distribution function, 17 the diffusion data were reconstructed in the Montreal Neurological Institute space using q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction. 18 A diffusion sampling length ratio of 1.25 was used, with isotropic output resolution of 2 mm.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector regression (SVR) ( Schultz, 2012 ) and CNNs ( Koppers et al, 2017b ) have been used for estimating the number of compartments in a voxel. Deep learning models such as CNNs ( Koppers et al, 2017a ; Koppers and Merhof, 2016 ; Lin et al, 2019 ) and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) ( Nath et al, 2019a ; 2019b ) have been used for estimating fODFs from diffusion signal. One study proposed a method that combined unsupervised machine learning with standard optimization-based methods for fODF estimation ( Patel et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%