2022
DOI: 10.3390/computation10110201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Neural Network Algorithms for Parabolic PIDEs and Applications in Insurance and Finance

Abstract: In this paper we study deep neural network algorithms for solving inear and semilinear parabolic partial integro-differential equations with boundary conditions in high dimension. Our method can be considered as an extension of the deep splitting method for PDEs to equations with non-local terms. To show the viability of our approach, we discuss several case studies from insurance and finance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Q1.2: Regarding the pricing of non-life products, the problems focus on model simplification through feature selection, data cleaning, and the extraction of outliers, along with techniques to improve prediction capacity, such as RNN and SHAP [25,26], isotonic recalibration [27], tree-based ensemble [28], Hierarchical Risk-factors Adaptive Top-down (PHiRAT) [29], logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, feed-forward network [30], transaction models for in life IBNR, inconclusive [31], integration of graphic themes [32], and extreme event estimation [33]. Moreover, currently, more efficient prediction models have been developed with techniques such as extreme gradient boosting or XGBoost [34], Bayesian CART models [35], boosting [36], and deep neural networks [36][37][38], among others.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q1.2: Regarding the pricing of non-life products, the problems focus on model simplification through feature selection, data cleaning, and the extraction of outliers, along with techniques to improve prediction capacity, such as RNN and SHAP [25,26], isotonic recalibration [27], tree-based ensemble [28], Hierarchical Risk-factors Adaptive Top-down (PHiRAT) [29], logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, feed-forward network [30], transaction models for in life IBNR, inconclusive [31], integration of graphic themes [32], and extreme event estimation [33]. Moreover, currently, more efficient prediction models have been developed with techniques such as extreme gradient boosting or XGBoost [34], Bayesian CART models [35], boosting [36], and deep neural networks [36][37][38], among others.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, In addition to FEM, Frey et al (2022) and Sacchetti et al (2022) have also discussed the feasibility of using NN to solve PDE, and attempted to use NN to solve PDEs with different boundary conditions and types. Their conclusions indicate that using NN to solve PDEs can achieve more accurate results than FEM, especially when it comes to analyze data with time properties or high-dimensional data, but the network structure of NN is often relatively complex [43][44].…”
Section: Solving Pdes Based On Pinnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature also contains approaches that are more closely related to the machine learning-based algorithm presented here. Frey and Köck [82,83] propose an approximation method for non-local semilinear parabolic PDEs with Dirichlet boundary conditions based on and extending the deep splitting method in [65] and carry out numerical simulations for example PDEs in up to 4 dimensions. Castro [84] proposes a numerical scheme for approximately solving non-local nonlinear PDEs based on [64] and proves convergence results for this scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%