2020
DOI: 10.3390/s21010025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Neural Network Sleep Scoring Using Combined Motion and Heart Rate Variability Data

Abstract: Background: Performance of wrist actigraphy in assessing sleep not only depends on the sensor technology of the actigraph hardware but also on the attributes of the interpretative algorithm (IA). The objective of our research was to improve assessment of sleep quality, relative to existing IAs, through development of a novel IA using deep learning methods, utilizing as input activity count and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics of different window length (number of epochs of data). Methods: Simultaneously re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of RM-OSM ranges from 76.2% to With the exception of single methods, mix methods are adopted, including ACT & ECG, 240,241 ACT & RM, 236,242 ECG & RM, 227,[243][244][245][246] ECG & OSM, 247 RM & OSM, 236 ACT & ECG & RM, 248 and ACT & RM & OSM, 236 their accuracies range from 69% to 95.7%, with an average accuracy of 84.16%. As compared to single methods, mix methods were more accurate and better at sleep staging.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of RM-OSM ranges from 76.2% to With the exception of single methods, mix methods are adopted, including ACT & ECG, 240,241 ACT & RM, 236,242 ECG & RM, 227,[243][244][245][246] ECG & OSM, 247 RM & OSM, 236 ACT & ECG & RM, 248 and ACT & RM & OSM, 236 their accuracies range from 69% to 95.7%, with an average accuracy of 84.16%. As compared to single methods, mix methods were more accurate and better at sleep staging.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern consumer wearables remain limited in their ability to assess these parameters and should not yet be considered substitutes for gold standard polysomnography. 90,91…”
Section: Assessment Of Sleep Quality and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the application of artificial intelligence deep learning algorithms incorporating wearable‐generated data appears promising, this is a growing area of research for which the evidence base remains limited. Modern consumer wearables remain limited in their ability to assess these parameters and should not yet be considered substitutes for gold standard polysomnography 90,91 …”
Section: Assessment Of Sleep Quality and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example is actigraphy, which has been widely applied in sleep research owing to its advantages of cost-efficiency and reduced influence on sleep [ 6 ]. Actigraphy-based sleep scoring has been further encouraged with the recent use of machine or deep learning algorithms [ 7 , 8 ] or additional physiological parameters such as heart rate variability [ 9 , 10 ]. However, the actigraphy-based sleep scoring algorithms suffer from low specificity, that is, low performance in detecting Wake epochs (between 0.28 and 0.67 [ 11 ]), and distinguishing different sleep stages with actigraphy is even more challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%