“…In the former studies, both effective connectivity (e.g., Lee et al, 2020) and functional connectivity (e.g., Vidaurre et al, 2020) measures have been investigated, however, these studies employed various metrics of connectivity including coherence, phase synchronization, phase-slope index, etc., which employ different algorithms and hence vary in their interpretation (Bastos and Schoffelen, 2016). However, to fully tackle the disadvantages of EEG, such as artifacts and inter-trial/inter-subject amplitude variability, phase-based relationships (e.g., phase synchronization) might provide the best functional connectivity measure of spatially distributed regions that are active during mental task execution (Caicedo-Acosta et al, 2021). Functional connectivity features measured by the phase lag index (PLI) and phase-locking value (PLV) can discriminate between different MI tasks (Stefano Filho et al, 2018;Caicedo-Acosta et al, 2021), and therefore are a promising tool to identify potential non-learners (Caicedo-Acosta et al, 2021).…”