2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0495-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Improves Laparoscopic Surgical Conditions: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Abstract: Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…condKoo [17]2016General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB4 point1 (excellent)–4 (poor)UnknownEnd of surgery% subopt./opt. cond., increase IAP ( n )Kim [25]2016General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)UnknownEnd of surgerySRS, titrated IAPRosenberg [18]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB11 point0 (poor)–10 (excellent)UnknownEnd of surgeryMean SRS, SRS distributionOzdemir [22]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)Unknown15 minMean SRS, SRS distributionOzdemir [23]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)Unknown15 minMean SRS, SRS distribution SRS surgical rating scale, % subopt ./ opt. Cond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…condKoo [17]2016General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB4 point1 (excellent)–4 (poor)UnknownEnd of surgery% subopt./opt. cond., increase IAP ( n )Kim [25]2016General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)UnknownEnd of surgerySRS, titrated IAPRosenberg [18]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB11 point0 (poor)–10 (excellent)UnknownEnd of surgeryMean SRS, SRS distributionOzdemir [22]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)Unknown15 minMean SRS, SRS distributionOzdemir [23]2017General surgeryDeep versus moderate NMB5 point a 1 (extremely poor)–5 (optimal)Unknown15 minMean SRS, SRS distribution SRS surgical rating scale, % subopt ./ opt. Cond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some only reported the percentage of unacceptable surgical conditions, which was generally the frequency of scores on the lower half of the surgical rating scale [3, 17, 20]. In addition, the number and moments of scoring differed considerably, with some studies scoring every 10 or 15 min [1, 2, 4, 7, 19, 20], while others scored one overall score at the end of surgery [3, 5, 8, 15, 17, 18, 21]. Some reports do not mention a scoring interval at all [16, 24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les critères secondaires étaient l'EEC thoracique, le nombre de bolus demandés, les événements chirurgicaux peropératoires, les scores de douleur (jusqu'à 12 h postopératoires) et la durée de la chirurgie. Résultats L'EEC abdominale médiane [écart interquartile] n'était pas différente entre les groupes intervention (4 [4][5]) et témoin (4 [4][5]) (différence médiane, 0; intervalle de confiance 95 %, 0 à 0; P = 0,45). L'EEC thoracique était de 4 dans les deux groupes (P = 0,23).…”
Section: Résuméunclassified
“…Many studies examined the influence of the neuromuscular block (NMB) on the quality of operating conditions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Therefore, intraabdominal measurements, e.g., of abdominal volume, were performed [2,5,6], and several scores were developed [4,8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%