2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20143896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Physiological Model for Blood Glucose Prediction in T1DM Patients

Abstract: Accurate estimations for the near future levels of blood glucose are crucial for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) patients in order to be able to react on time and avoid hypo and hyper-glycemic episodes. Accurate predictions for blood glucose are the base for control algorithms in glucose regulating systems such as the artificial pancreas. Numerous research studies have already been conducted in order to provide predictions for blood glucose levels with particularities in the input signals and underlying models… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This random partitioning of the data into training and validation subsets and repeating the process across multiple folds is called cross-validation. Studies across the literature have used different validation strategies such as random sampling [ 20 , 65 - 67 ], time-based splitting [ 4 , 5 , 67 - 69 ], patient-specific splitting [ 6 , 32 , 53 , 70 , 71 ], or a combination of these methods to estimate predictive model performance. Simple random sampling–based cross-validation [ 72 , 73 ] may not fully address the generalizability aspect of the model to new patients and new time periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This random partitioning of the data into training and validation subsets and repeating the process across multiple folds is called cross-validation. Studies across the literature have used different validation strategies such as random sampling [ 20 , 65 - 67 ], time-based splitting [ 4 , 5 , 67 - 69 ], patient-specific splitting [ 6 , 32 , 53 , 70 , 71 ], or a combination of these methods to estimate predictive model performance. Simple random sampling–based cross-validation [ 72 , 73 ] may not fully address the generalizability aspect of the model to new patients and new time periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of memory units in the LSTM cells for the first layer has been set to 10 and has been reduced to 5 in the second LSTM layer. These values have been previously validated in studies such as [ 21 ]. Dropout regularization layers have also been used in order to minimize overfitting problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex machine learning models using several LSTM layers have shown better performance when predicting upcoming values of blood glucose (BG) levels than shallow models [ 3 , 18 , 19 , 21 ]. A good machine learning model will be able to compensate some inaccuracy levels in the input data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate glucose prediction is also vital for the early and proactive regulation of blood glucose before it drifts to undesirable levels. Therefore, numerous approaches, based on physical models or data-driven empirical models, have been proposed to predict glucose levels [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%