Medical Imaging 2020: Image Processing 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2548576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep similarity learning using a siamese ResNet trained on similarity labels from disparity maps of cerebral MRA MIP pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that most commonly used metrics fail to accurately represent the distances in geometric parameter space that generate the mismatch between the current observations. It is thus not surprising that ten studies describe methods to better model and quantify the similarity between the source and target images to increase the capture range, and thus, the likelihood of registration success (Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Liao et al, 2019;Schaffert et al, 2019Schaffert et al, , 2020bSchaffert et al, 2020a;Gao et al, 2020c;Grupp et al, 2020c;Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Neumann et al, 2020). Some studies propose novel image similarity functions S θS (•, •) that, analogous to traditional similarity metrics, accept as input the source and target image and return a scalar or vector that is related to the mismatch in parameter space (Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Neumann et al, 2020;Grupp et al, 2020c;Gao et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Similarity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is well known that most commonly used metrics fail to accurately represent the distances in geometric parameter space that generate the mismatch between the current observations. It is thus not surprising that ten studies describe methods to better model and quantify the similarity between the source and target images to increase the capture range, and thus, the likelihood of registration success (Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Liao et al, 2019;Schaffert et al, 2019Schaffert et al, , 2020bSchaffert et al, 2020a;Gao et al, 2020c;Grupp et al, 2020c;Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Neumann et al, 2020). Some studies propose novel image similarity functions S θS (•, •) that, analogous to traditional similarity metrics, accept as input the source and target image and return a scalar or vector that is related to the mismatch in parameter space (Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Neumann et al, 2020;Grupp et al, 2020c;Gao et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Similarity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus not surprising that ten studies describe methods to better model and quantify the similarity between the source and target images to increase the capture range, and thus, the likelihood of registration success (Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Liao et al, 2019;Schaffert et al, 2019Schaffert et al, , 2020bSchaffert et al, 2020a;Gao et al, 2020c;Grupp et al, 2020c;Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Neumann et al, 2020). Some studies propose novel image similarity functions S θS (•, •) that, analogous to traditional similarity metrics, accept as input the source and target image and return a scalar or vector that is related to the mismatch in parameter space (Francois et al, 2020;Gu et al, 2020;Tang and Scalzo, 2016;Neumann et al, 2020;Grupp et al, 2020c;Gao et al, 2020b). Among those, two methods rely on regularization: Grupp et al (2020c) detect anatomical landmarks to expand an analytic similarity function with landmark-reprojection constraints to enhance the capture range of an intensity-based strategy, while Francois et al (2020) segment occluding contours to constrain similarity evaluation to salient regions.…”
Section: Similarity Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations