34th European Mask and Lithography Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2324341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep supervised learning to estimate true rough line images from SEM images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, suitably optimised DnCNN method can be successfully used for denoising of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. 16,17 This also improves the accuracy nanometre-scale SEM measurements. Some scholars applied the previously proposed network to mapping between images, giving the network structure a new application prospect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, suitably optimised DnCNN method can be successfully used for denoising of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. 16,17 This also improves the accuracy nanometre-scale SEM measurements. Some scholars applied the previously proposed network to mapping between images, giving the network structure a new application prospect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The DnCNN can be modified into a new network model to meet different image requirements. For example, suitably optimised DnCNN method can be successfully used for denoising of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images 16,17 . This also improves the accuracy nanometre‐scale SEM measurements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since deep learning 36 has altered the practices of signal, image, and video processing, its rapid advances may offer the potential to better address these issues, particularly since line and contour measurements currently require an average of multiple lines or contours in order to sufficiently improve precision (see, e.g., [ 29,30 directly outputs a matrix of dimension 2 × 1024 with the estimated left and right edge positions of the line; we will discuss EDGENet and the simulated dataset used to study it, and we point the audience to References 4 and 24 for a sample of the extensive literature on LER and its estimation. Since CD-SEM metrology artifacts affect the accuracy of LER measurements, 38 we propose denoising as a first step in constructing prediction intervals and apply our group's Poisson denoising CNN SEMNet, 30,42 which was designed for the same dataset as EDGENet. We use various computer vision and image processing techniques in combination with the conformal prediction and conformalized quantile regression frameworks to examine how the EDGENet LER prediction errors are related to the "noise image" defined as the absolute difference between a noisy input image and its associated denoised output image from SEMNet.…”
Section: Background On Lermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D is the output of the denoiser SEMNet 30,42 for input x i , and the corresponding residual or absolute prediction error; this approach appears to be related to meta-learning 25 for this application since there is a correlation between noise and other artifacts and the difficulty of edge detection. 38 The normalized nonconformity score associated with γ is…”
Section: On Conformal Prediction and Conformalized Quantile Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%