1989
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1989)028<0414:dvrase>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Valley Radiation and Surface Energy Budget Microclimates. Part I: Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If such an approximation is to be performed reliably, not only net radiometers but also pyranometers should be installed to distinguish the total, direct and diffuse shortwave radiation components. In such a way, direct shortwave radiation can be easily corrected for slope effects knowing the azimuthal and elevation angles, latitude and surface inclination (Garnier and Ohmura 1968;Whiteman et al 1989). Since direct shortwave radiation represents 60 to 80 % of R n for mid-latitudes, and is the component most affected by slope effects (Holst et al 2005), such post-processing correction typically yields acceptable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such an approximation is to be performed reliably, not only net radiometers but also pyranometers should be installed to distinguish the total, direct and diffuse shortwave radiation components. In such a way, direct shortwave radiation can be easily corrected for slope effects knowing the azimuthal and elevation angles, latitude and surface inclination (Garnier and Ohmura 1968;Whiteman et al 1989). Since direct shortwave radiation represents 60 to 80 % of R n for mid-latitudes, and is the component most affected by slope effects (Holst et al 2005), such post-processing correction typically yields acceptable results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not only depends on the inclination of the slope as the solar declination also modifies this parameter as well as the slope azimuth angle. can be defined as the difference between β and Z , where β is the angle between the solar beam and the normal to the slope, whereas Z is the solar zenith angle (Whiteman et al 1989). Matzinger et al (2003) presented an empiric relationship between the horizontally measured net radiation Q * and the slope parallel measured Q * .…”
Section: Surface Radiation On An Inclined Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REBS instrument was intercalibrated with the Swissteco reference instrument in the field at Happy Valley (69°07 0 N, 148°50 0 W) on 18 -19 June 1995, and new calibration factors for the REBS instrument were derived and used throughout the study. Because of unequal response to shortwave and long-wave radiation of the REBS instruments [Field et al, 1992;Whiteman et al, 1989], different calibration coefficients were used for R n ! 0 and R n < 0.…”
Section: Additional Measurements From Toolik Lakementioning
confidence: 99%