2016
DOI: 10.1002/jid.3233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deepening Divides: Decentralized Development and the ‘Tyranny’ of Participation

Abstract: Decentralized governance and its possible shortcomings have been receiving increased attention in development discourse. However, there still remains a dearth of empirical data highlighting such pitfalls. Drawing on in-depth interviews and literature reviews, this paper explores the extent of decentralized development planning at the grassroots level. Using the state of Kerala, India as a case study, I explore how local government institutions, specifically those in areas of disadvantaged communities, might op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the evidence of decentralization propelling participation is not only limited and unconvincing, but it is inconclusive in two respects. One, while local citizens are mostly not homogenous in terms of wealth, most discussions of citizens' participation lump all grassroots people together (Botchway 2001;Nair 2016). However, the evidence firmly demonstrates that, there are more structural barriers facing the poor than the non-poor with respect to participation (La Ferrara 2002;Caínzos and Voces 2010;McNulty 2015).…”
Section: Decentralization and Participation: A Brief Overview Of Theo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the evidence of decentralization propelling participation is not only limited and unconvincing, but it is inconclusive in two respects. One, while local citizens are mostly not homogenous in terms of wealth, most discussions of citizens' participation lump all grassroots people together (Botchway 2001;Nair 2016). However, the evidence firmly demonstrates that, there are more structural barriers facing the poor than the non-poor with respect to participation (La Ferrara 2002;Caínzos and Voces 2010;McNulty 2015).…”
Section: Decentralization and Participation: A Brief Overview Of Theo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, empirical studies examining the degree of Mozambican citizens' satisfaction with their involvement in administrative processes are lacking. The absence of studies on the effectiveness of such channels is a potential threat to ongoing administrative reforms, as without research evidence, they can be only symbolic rather than authentic (King et al, 1998; Nair, 2016).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the emergence of the 'tyranny' criticism, some scholars find it too radical and critical (e.g. Hickey and Mohan 2004;Nair 2016). Pollock and Sharp (2012) contend that urban redevelopment and community participation and empowerment are in essence conflictual.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Tyranny Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%