2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepMerge – II. Building robust deep learning algorithms for merging galaxy identification across domains

Abstract: In astronomy, neural networks are often trained on simulation data with the prospect of being used on telescope observations. Unfortunately, training a model on simulation data and then applying it to instrument data leads to a substantial and potentially even detrimental decrease in model accuracy on the new target dataset. Simulated and instrument data represent different data domains, and for an algorithm to work in both, domain-invariant learning is necessary. Here we employ domain adaptation techniques— M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The parameters for our source and target data sets are shown in Table I. Better results on all methods were achieved when starting UDA training with models that were pretrained in a supervised fashion using source data, as discussed in [67]. As such, our models were trained starting from models pre-trained on the source simulation data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 The parameters for our source and target data sets are shown in Table I. Better results on all methods were achieved when starting UDA training with models that were pretrained in a supervised fashion using source data, as discussed in [67]. As such, our models were trained starting from models pre-trained on the source simulation data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the same architecture that has achieved top performance in previous applications to lensing data sets [34,51,57]. More generally, CNNs are known to outperform other methods of classification for strong gravitational lenses [119], nonetheless, as noted by [67], a model trained on simulations can perform poorly on real data.…”
Section: Domain Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown in Refs. [92,93] that domain adaptation methods offer great promise for astrophysics and cosmology. Domain adaptation methods [94], implemented during model training, help extract only features present in all datasets.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%

Machine Learning and Cosmology

Dvorkin,
Mishra-Sharma,
Nord
et al. 2022
Preprint
“…Presently, automated merger classification and characterization models are predominantly based on optical morphologies or other information derived from imaging (e.g. recently Pawlik et al 2016;Ackermann et al 2018;Snyder et al 2019;Walmsley et al 2019;Pearson et al 2019;Nevin et al 2019;Bottrell et al 2019b;Ćiprijanović et al 2020, 2021c. However, classification performance may be improved using other information from which a model can draw -independently, or in tandem with imaging.…”
Section: Rationale For Multi-variate Classification With Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%