2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepPhenology: Estimation of apple flower phenology distributions based on deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All data were collected within one day. In a second study, Wang et al ( 2021 ) used the same method for data acquisition, but data were collected not only on one but throughout 26 days to classify different flower phenology stages and their distribution on the tree. The flowering stage was also investigated by Pahalawatta et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were collected within one day. In a second study, Wang et al ( 2021 ) used the same method for data acquisition, but data were collected not only on one but throughout 26 days to classify different flower phenology stages and their distribution on the tree. The flowering stage was also investigated by Pahalawatta et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image‐based setups coupled with computer vision techniques are increasingly being suggested for monitoring flowers, especially in agricultural settings (Jiang et al., 2020; Palacios et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). Such methods can facilitate automated and efficient assessment of phenology and crop yield forecasting, but often requires human camera operators of custom‐made mobile imaging platforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to optimize and improve the existing network model to meet the detection needs of this research. Currently, object detection technology has been used in strawberries [30][31][32], grapes [33], apple fruits [34,35], flowers [36], maize [25], and rice [37,38], and has achieved relatively good application results. There is scientific evidence about the accuracy of the proposed architecture described in the studies by Li et al [39], in which YOLO-JD has achieved the best detection accuracy, with an average mAP of 96.63%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%