2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepScaffold: A Comprehensive Tool for Scaffold-Based De Novo Drug Discovery Using Deep Learning

Abstract: The ultimate goal of drug design is to find novel compounds with desirable pharmacological properties. Designing molecules retaining particular scaffolds as the core structures of the molecules is one of the efficient ways to obtain potential drug candidates with desirable properties. We proposed a scaffold-based molecular generative model for scaffold-based drug discovery, which performs molecule generation based on a wide spectrum of scaffold definitions, including BM-scaffolds, cyclic skeletons, as well as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This particularity is noticeable in scaffolds (6), (8), and especially (10) and may point to applicability domain limitations of the APM. Moreover, the absolute number of different molecules decorated varied greatly among scaffolds, and the total number of molecules (26,140) was approximately two times greater than that of the previous section, possibly because the model had less information from the scaffolds and was less focused. Lastly, the overlap between the decoys and the generated molecules was also calculated and yielded higher results to those in the previous section (Additional file 2: Table S3).…”
Section: Generating Molecules From New Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This particularity is noticeable in scaffolds (6), (8), and especially (10) and may point to applicability domain limitations of the APM. Moreover, the absolute number of different molecules decorated varied greatly among scaffolds, and the total number of molecules (26,140) was approximately two times greater than that of the previous section, possibly because the model had less information from the scaffolds and was less focused. Lastly, the overlap between the decoys and the generated molecules was also calculated and yielded higher results to those in the previous section (Additional file 2: Table S3).…”
Section: Generating Molecules From New Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Two approaches have been published [25,26] that use Graph Generative Neural Networks instead of SMILES to represent molecules. They train only one model each and use a general drug-like molecular set as training data, which is preprocessed.…”
Section: Comparing Smiles-based and Ggnn Scaffold Decoratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a partially-built molecule with explicit attachment points) mainly due to the restrictions of the SMILES syntax. Some approaches have been reported that use graph generative neural networks (GGNN) which are even able to decorate a scaffold without the need of specifying attachment points [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was recognised that various kinds of architectures could in fact permit the reversal of this numerical encoding so as to return a molecule (or its SMILES string encoding a unique structure). These are known as generative methods [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], and at heart their aim to generate a suitable and computationally useful representation [51] of the input data. It is common (but cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%