2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.12437
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepShadows: Separating Low Surface Brightness Galaxies from Artifacts using Deep Learning

Abstract: Searches for low-surface-brightness galaxies (LSBGs) in galaxy surveys are plagued by the presence of a large number of artifacts (e.g., objects blended in the diffuse light from stars and galaxies, Galactic cirrus, star-forming regions in the arms of spiral galaxies, etc.) that have to be rejected through time consuming visual inspection. In future surveys, which are expected to collect hundreds of petabytes of data and detect billions of objects, such an approach will not be feasible. We investigate the use … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major game changer throughout astronomy and astrophysics has been the widespread application of machine learning and deep learning techniques (Ball and Brunner, 2010;Kremer et al, 2017;Bethapudi and Desai, 2018;Baron, 2019), and galaxy morphology is no exception to this. Applications of machine learning as well as deep learning to galaxy morphology classifications are discussed in Dieleman et al (2015), Tanoglidis et al (2020), Tuccillo et al (2017), Barchi et al (2020), Khan et al (2019), Spindler et al (2020), Bhambra et al (2021) and Reza (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major game changer throughout astronomy and astrophysics has been the widespread application of machine learning and deep learning techniques (Ball and Brunner, 2010;Kremer et al, 2017;Bethapudi and Desai, 2018;Baron, 2019), and galaxy morphology is no exception to this. Applications of machine learning as well as deep learning to galaxy morphology classifications are discussed in Dieleman et al (2015), Tanoglidis et al (2020), Tuccillo et al (2017), Barchi et al (2020), Khan et al (2019), Spindler et al (2020), Bhambra et al (2021) and Reza (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%