2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.09340
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepVesselNet: Vessel Segmentation, Centerline Prediction, and Bifurcation Detection in 3-D Angiographic Volumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our graph extraction protocol begins with a given whole-brain vascular segmentation. Independent of segmentation method used (deep learning or filter-based), we tested the following state-of-the-art graph extraction algorithms: 1) the TubeMap method [7] which uses pruning on a 27-neighborhood skeletonization after a deep learning based tube-filling algorithm, based on a modified DeepVesselNet architecture [28]; 2) the metric graph reconstruction algorithm by Aanjaneya et al [29] which reduces linear connections of a skeleton to form a more compact and topologically correct graph and 3) the Voreen vessel graph extraction method [30,31]. We tested the graph extraction algorithms on different imaging modalities, varying brain areas, and synthetically generated vascular trees [32].…”
Section: Graph Extraction From Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our graph extraction protocol begins with a given whole-brain vascular segmentation. Independent of segmentation method used (deep learning or filter-based), we tested the following state-of-the-art graph extraction algorithms: 1) the TubeMap method [7] which uses pruning on a 27-neighborhood skeletonization after a deep learning based tube-filling algorithm, based on a modified DeepVesselNet architecture [28]; 2) the metric graph reconstruction algorithm by Aanjaneya et al [29] which reduces linear connections of a skeleton to form a more compact and topologically correct graph and 3) the Voreen vessel graph extraction method [30,31]. We tested the graph extraction algorithms on different imaging modalities, varying brain areas, and synthetically generated vascular trees [32].…”
Section: Graph Extraction From Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stark contrast to previous works, where segmentation and centerline prediction has been learned jointly as multi-task learning [37,34], we are not interested in learning the centerline. We are interested in learning a topologypreserving segmentation.…”
Section: Missing Skeletonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For vessel segmentation task, the object of interest accounts far less than the background voxels in most cases, which leads to a high rate of false positive and recall values [12]. To alleviate the class-imbalance problem caused by the inequitable penalty of positive and negative voxels, we separate the training process as two stage: 1) In the pre-trained stage, we use NLL(Negative Log Likelihood) loss to get a coarse model; 2) In the fine-tuned stage, we resume the coarse model and adopt a weight-balanced loss to suppress the over-segmentation and high false-positive rate: the calculated voxel-wised losses of both positive and negative positions are sorted, and the negative sorted list is much longer than the positive one considering the small occupancy of interest regions.…”
Section: Two-stage Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%