2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2013.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepVision in-trawl imaging: Sampling the water column in four dimensions

Abstract: Funding has come from Scantrol AS in cooperation with a variety of sources within the Research Council of Norway. Specifically, Naerings-PhD programme project # 194968 (Automatisk klassifisering og sortering of fisk I trål), MAROFF programme project # 187336 (Automatisk klassifisering og sortering of fisk I trål), HAVKYST programme project # 178432 (Commercial mid-water trawling for cod, haddock and saithe: Shifting effort to reduce impact on bottom fauna of bottom trawling) and the Centre for Research Innovat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological information in our study was collected with a mesopelagic midwater trawl with a headline height of 12-15 m and a door spread of around 140-160 m, which remains open through the WC as it descends to the depth where the targeted acoustic marks for mark identification were observed on the echograms. Traditional trawling does not provide a fine spatial scale resolution causing the loss of crucial information to classify discrete acoustic layers into species (Kracker, 1999;Rosen and Christian, 2013). This issue is accentuated when the sampling aims to collect biological information from one of the DSLs commonly observed in open ocean ecosystems, which are distributed vertically at different depth ranges.…”
Section: Mark Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biological information in our study was collected with a mesopelagic midwater trawl with a headline height of 12-15 m and a door spread of around 140-160 m, which remains open through the WC as it descends to the depth where the targeted acoustic marks for mark identification were observed on the echograms. Traditional trawling does not provide a fine spatial scale resolution causing the loss of crucial information to classify discrete acoustic layers into species (Kracker, 1999;Rosen and Christian, 2013). This issue is accentuated when the sampling aims to collect biological information from one of the DSLs commonly observed in open ocean ecosystems, which are distributed vertically at different depth ranges.…”
Section: Mark Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is accentuated when the sampling aims to collect biological information from one of the DSLs commonly observed in open ocean ecosystems, which are distributed vertically at different depth ranges. To overcome this limitation, we need to move away from traditional single cod end trawl nets to use trawls with opening-closing mouths or cod ends, or in-trawl stereo cameras, or combine different types or trawls, or use acoustic and optic sampling (AOS) devices mounted on trawls and combine their information (Pearcy, 1983;Rosen and Christian, 2013;Kwong et al, 2018). Sampling of micronekton is still a topic that requires further research and development, as all sampling methods have their particular biases (often referred to as catchability).…”
Section: Mark Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five images per second were collected, starting before the trawl was set out and ending when it came back onboard the vessel, saving a continuous time-referenced record of all objects that passed through the trawl during the shooting, trawling, and heaving phases. The system and its measurement accuracy are described in detail by Rosen et al [10] and Rosen and Holst [12] . In this study, the system was operated in autonomous mode without cable connection to the vessel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Deep Vision system has been used for several surveys to identify, quantify and measure the length of large fish such as adult Northeast Arctic cod ( Gadus morhua ), haddock ( Melanogrammus aeglefinus ) and Atlantic mackerel ( Scomber scombrus ) along the trawl track. Time-references for each image can be matched up with data such as geographic position and acoustic backscatter information collected by the vessel's echo sounder [12] . The stereo images can be processed to calculate the size of passing objects with high accuracy (less than 5% error; [10] ) as well as the spatial distribution along the trawl path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). When affixed to the entrance of nets, camera systems also offer the potential to gather in‐trawl information on target and non‐target species during surveys, allowing for a more detailed description of the catch, species distribution in the water column, and method efficiency (Rosen and Holst ). The impact of trawl methods on non‐target fishery stocks is another consideration, with implications for management.…”
Section: Ecosystem‐ and Population‐level Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%