2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2017.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeepXScope: Segmenting Microscopy Images with a Deep Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pipeline represents a valuable technical advance because previously published automatic stomatal detection and counting algorithms: (1) used data that were collected by slow and laborious methods (e.g., Aono et al, 2019 ; Bhugra et al, 2019 ; Sakoda et al, 2019 ); (2) were limited to detecting stomata and not pavement cells (e.g., Dittberner et al, 2018 ; Fetter et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Sakoda et al, 2019 ); (3) did not achieve the same accuracy (e.g., Duarte et al, 2017 ; Saponaro et al, 2017 ; Bourdais et al, 2019 ); or (4) were demonstrated to work only within the constrained variation of a limited sample set, which did not include demonstrated applicability for quantitative genetics (e.g., Aono et al, 2019 ; Fetter et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ). Although previous studies achieved these goals individually, combining these features resulted in a tool that could be applied to addressing knowledge gaps about the genetic architecture and trait relationships of epidermal cells in maize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pipeline represents a valuable technical advance because previously published automatic stomatal detection and counting algorithms: (1) used data that were collected by slow and laborious methods (e.g., Aono et al, 2019 ; Bhugra et al, 2019 ; Sakoda et al, 2019 ); (2) were limited to detecting stomata and not pavement cells (e.g., Dittberner et al, 2018 ; Fetter et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Sakoda et al, 2019 ); (3) did not achieve the same accuracy (e.g., Duarte et al, 2017 ; Saponaro et al, 2017 ; Bourdais et al, 2019 ); or (4) were demonstrated to work only within the constrained variation of a limited sample set, which did not include demonstrated applicability for quantitative genetics (e.g., Aono et al, 2019 ; Fetter et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ). Although previous studies achieved these goals individually, combining these features resulted in a tool that could be applied to addressing knowledge gaps about the genetic architecture and trait relationships of epidermal cells in maize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many attempts to address the phenotyping bottleneck for stomatal patterning through computer-aided image analysis. Classical image processing methods ( Omasa and Onoe, 1984 ; Liu et al, 2016 ; Duarte et al, 2017 ) and machine learning models have been applied ( Vialet-Chabrand and Brendel, 2014 ; Higaki et al, 2015 ; Jayakody et al, 2017 ; Saponaro et al, 2017 ; Dittberner et al, 2018 ; Toda et al, 2018 ; Aono et al, 2019 ; Bhugra et al, 2019 ; Fetter et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Sakoda et al, 2019 ). Although a number of these methods have been demonstrated to work within constrained image sets, none of them have been widely adopted, even within a single species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these methods demonstrate efficacy on their respective tasks, they rely on handcrafted and/or multistage processes. The use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to detect stomatal attributes has recently increased in popularity (Jayakody et al ., 2017; Saponaro et al ., 2017; Toda et al ., 2018; Bhugra et al ., 2018, 2019; Falk et al ., 2019; Fetter et al ., 2019; Li et al ., 2019; Meeus et al ., 2020; Gibbs et al ., 2021). Convolutional Neural Networks enable a series of pertinent operations to be learnt from examples – acting as a data‐driven approximation of a sequence of computer vision operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these methods demon- strate efficacy on their respective tasks, they rely on handcrafted and/or multi-stage processes. The use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to detect stomatal attributes has recently increased in popularity [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . CNNs enable a series of pertinent operations to be learnt from examples -acting as a data driven approximation of a sequence of computer vision operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%