2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-016-1367-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deer herbivory affects the functional diversity of forest floor plants via changes in competition‐mediated assembly rules

Abstract: Distorted plant diversity patterns due to ungulate herbivory could be explained by changes in community assembly processes, but the effects of ungulate herbivory on plant community assembly remain unclear. Here, we examined the role of deer herbivory in the regulation of the assembly processes of a forest floor plant community by assessing species and functional diversity in over-and no-grazing plots (control and exclosure plots, respectively) in Shiretoko National Park in Japan. Compared with the exclosure pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is striking that deer emerged as a moderator for the plant cover of this species group, not only in other parts of Europe (Kirby & Thomas, 2000;Perrin, Mitchell, & Kelly, 2011), but also for Rubus spp. species in the United States (Faison et al, 2016;Horsley, Stout, & deCalesta, 2003;Murray et al, 2016;Royo et al, 2010 (Faison et al, 2016;Murray et al, 2016;Nishizawa et al, 2016;Perrin et al, 2011). After 10 years of fencing, the lower species richness of the herbaceous layer inside the exclosures of our 82-site network, along with the gradual response to deer abundances provide a large-scale support for this grazing curve.…”
Section: Effects Of Variations In Ungulate Abundance Among Sitesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is striking that deer emerged as a moderator for the plant cover of this species group, not only in other parts of Europe (Kirby & Thomas, 2000;Perrin, Mitchell, & Kelly, 2011), but also for Rubus spp. species in the United States (Faison et al, 2016;Horsley, Stout, & deCalesta, 2003;Murray et al, 2016;Royo et al, 2010 (Faison et al, 2016;Murray et al, 2016;Nishizawa et al, 2016;Perrin et al, 2011). After 10 years of fencing, the lower species richness of the herbaceous layer inside the exclosures of our 82-site network, along with the gradual response to deer abundances provide a large-scale support for this grazing curve.…”
Section: Effects Of Variations In Ungulate Abundance Among Sitesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The classic grazing response curve, based on the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, predicting an increase in plant species richness from low to moderate browsing pressure, has been already locally documented (Faison et al., ; Murray et al., ; Nishizawa et al., ; Perrin et al., ). After 10 years of fencing, the lower species richness of the herbaceous layer inside the exclosures of our 82‐site network, along with the gradual response to deer abundances provide a large‐scale support for this grazing curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, moderate grazing is beneficial to the benign cycle of grassland ecology. Grazing had been banned for a long time, the biodiversity and biomass of grassland had declined [25,26] and the natural degradation gradually appeared. It is generally believed that five years was a suitable grazing ban period in Yanchi County, Ningxia [27,28].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Duration And Prescription Of The Gppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate functional distance, we used 10 functional traits that have been widely used in previous studies: two binary traits (clonality and deciduous/evergreen), three categorical traits (dispersal type: unassisted dispersal, wind dispersal, internal animal transport, external animal transport, dispersal by hoarding, dispersal by water, and dispersal by launching; Raunkiaer life form: phanerophytes, chamaephytes, hemicryptophytes, geophytes, therophytes, and biennial; and growth form: short basal, semi-basal, erect leafy, cushions, tussocks, dwarf shrubs, shrubs, trees, and climbers), and five numerical traits (seed mass, maximum height, width of leaf, specific leaf area [SLA], and leaf carbon:nitrogen ratio [leaf C/N]). Except for SLA and leaf C/N, all of the traits were collected from various pictorial books of Japanese flora (the same sources used by Nishizawa et al 2016), which covered all of the species in our inventory. For SLA, mean values were calculated for each species from five mature leaves sampled from five individuals of each species.…”
Section: Trait Data and Functional Distancementioning
confidence: 99%