2007
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v63.n4.4748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default Funds in U.K. Defined-Contribution Plans (corrected)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also means encouraging employers or other plan providers to offer default portfolios that provide reasonable expected returns at what might be considered by most to be acceptable risk (Beshears et al 2009). Some researchers also recommend limiting the number of portfolio choices to avoid information overload (Agnew and Szykman 2005;Byrne et al 2007;Cronqvist and Thaler 2004;Iyengar et al 2003).…”
Section: Default Plans For Passive Investorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also means encouraging employers or other plan providers to offer default portfolios that provide reasonable expected returns at what might be considered by most to be acceptable risk (Beshears et al 2009). Some researchers also recommend limiting the number of portfolio choices to avoid information overload (Agnew and Szykman 2005;Byrne et al 2007;Cronqvist and Thaler 2004;Iyengar et al 2003).…”
Section: Default Plans For Passive Investorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Latin American countries, including Chile, offer a limited number of portfolios and require the default investments to have a life-cycle strategy (Tapia and Yermo 2007). As of April 2005, the United Kingdom requires default funds to use some form of life-cycle fund (Byrne et al 2007). Sweden's default plan for its Premium Pension System introduced in 2000 had one portfolio regardless of age, but as of May 2010 a life-cycle default plan is required (Dahlquist et al 2012).…”
Section: Default Plans For Passive Investorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 8 and 9 depict the estimated measures obtained according to both approaches, for MF and IC investment distributions, respectively. 10 Though the goal of our study is not to advocate the life-cycle model in general, but rather to compare two potential approaches to the model, we have repeated our empirical analysis, using both investment distributions and both techniques of asset return estimation, for a pension fund that keeps all asset allocations constant throughout the employee's working career. The results (available upon request from the authors) demonstrate that employing this "non-life-cycle" model of investment distribution leads to significantly higher standard deviations of returns compared to those reported in tables 8 to 11 for the two approaches to the life-cycle model (for example, with MF investment distribution we obtain an estimated standard deviation of 9.29% and a simulated standard deviation of 1,312,581 NIS), the differences in the expected returns being much less dramatic.…”
Section: Accumulating Versus Switching Approach: Returns and Savings mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life-cycle investment strategies are also said to reduce the volatility of wealth outcomes making them desirable to investors who seek a reliable estimate of final pension a few years before retirement (e.g., Blake et al, 2001). On the other hand, some researchers note that these benefits come at a substantial cost to the investor -giving up the significant upside potential of wealth accumulation offered by more aggressive strategies (Booth and Yakoubov, 2000;Byrne et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an average asset allocation pattern similar to that of Ellement and Lucas, 9 as well as Pang. 10 5 Byrne et al (2007). 6 Glickman and Kuehneman (2006).…”
Section: S56mentioning
confidence: 99%