2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.04.455133
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default Mode Network Connectivity Predicts Individual Differences in Long-Term Forgetting: Evidence for Storage Decay, not Retrieval Failure

Abstract: Despite the importance of memories in everyday life and the progress made in understanding how they are encoded and retrieved, the neural processes by which declarative memories are maintained or forgotten remain elusive. Part of the problem is that it is empirically difficult to measure the rate at which memories fade and, without such a measure, it is hard to identify the corresponding neural correlates. This study addresses this problem using a combination of individual differences, model-based inferences, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that learner-specific prediction can work, even when the learning task is not so much about skills but rather about declarative knowledge, is in line with the idea of a learner's general forgetting rate being an individual trait. Learners' SoF has been found to persist over time (Sense et al, 2016), and can be related to resting state measures of brain activity (Xu et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2020). The larger the individual differences between learners, the more important learner-specific predictions are likely to be.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that learner-specific prediction can work, even when the learning task is not so much about skills but rather about declarative knowledge, is in line with the idea of a learner's general forgetting rate being an individual trait. Learners' SoF has been found to persist over time (Sense et al, 2016), and can be related to resting state measures of brain activity (Xu et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2020). The larger the individual differences between learners, the more important learner-specific predictions are likely to be.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of forgetting in particular appears to be a reliable individual trait with substantial variation between learners, that can be predicted from resting state neural activity and functional connectivity (Xu, Prat, Sense, van Rijn, & Stocco, 2021;Zhou, Sense, van Rijn, & Stocco, 2020). For adaptive fact learning systems, this inter-individual variability means that some learners will consistently require more frequent repetitions of a fact than others to maintain a desired level of performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, by integrating the SoF model with neuroimaging data, it is possible to uncover the underlying neural mechanisms responsible for memory decline in aging and disease. Recent studies by Zhou et al (26) and Xu et al (27) have demonstrated this approach utilizing previous iterations of the SoF task to analyze differences in functional connectivity networks and pinpoint specific brain regions correlated with forgetting.…”
Section: Underlying Memory Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sense et al found that speed of forgetting was characteristic of an individual, and was highly stable (r > 0.6) across time and materials (2016). Furthermore, using neuroimaging methods, Zhou et al (2021) and Xu et al (2021) found that not only does speed of forgetting capture individual differences in long-term memory function, but also correlates with, and can be decoded from, their spontaneous brain activity at rest.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%