2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-015-9359-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Default network connectivity decodes brain states with simulated microgravity

Abstract: With great progress of space navigation technology, it becomes possible to travel beyond Earth's gravity. So far, it remains unclear whether the human brain can function normally within an environment of microgravity and confinement. Particularly, it is a challenge to figure out some neuroimaging-based markers for rapid screening diagnosis of disrupted brain function in microgravity environment. In this study, a 7-day -6°head down tilt bed rest experiment was used to simulate the microgravity, and twenty healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.6 Subject-level analyses 2.6.1 Hypothesis-driven seed-to-voxel analyses We used a hypothesis-driven approach to examine resting-state functional connectivity (FC) between 14 regions of interest (ROIs) and the rest of the brain. Drawing upon the findings of previous HDBR studies in standard ambient air, we hypothesized that the two subgroups would exhibit differential patterns of FC involving brain areas related to multisensory integration, somatosensation, motor function, vestibular processing, and regions within the default mode network 5,24,25,[40][41][42][43] . The coordinates for the ROIs were the same as those used in our previous resting-state fMRI study using HDBR intervention in standard ambient air 5 .…”
Section: Image Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6 Subject-level analyses 2.6.1 Hypothesis-driven seed-to-voxel analyses We used a hypothesis-driven approach to examine resting-state functional connectivity (FC) between 14 regions of interest (ROIs) and the rest of the brain. Drawing upon the findings of previous HDBR studies in standard ambient air, we hypothesized that the two subgroups would exhibit differential patterns of FC involving brain areas related to multisensory integration, somatosensation, motor function, vestibular processing, and regions within the default mode network 5,24,25,[40][41][42][43] . The coordinates for the ROIs were the same as those used in our previous resting-state fMRI study using HDBR intervention in standard ambient air 5 .…”
Section: Image Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a hypothesis‐driven approach to examine resting‐state functional connectivity (FC) between 14 regions of interest (ROIs) and the rest of the brain. Drawing upon the findings of previous HDBR studies in standard ambient air, we hypothesized that the two subgroups would exhibit differential patterns of FC involving brain areas related to multisensory integration, somatosensation, motor function, vestibular processing, and regions within the default mode network (Cassady et al, 2016 ; Demertzi et al, 2016 ; Liao et al, 2014 ; Liao et al, 2015 ; Zeng et al, 2016 ; Zeng, Liao, Shen, Liu, & Hu, 2016 ; Zhou et al, 2014 ). The coordinates for the ROIs were the same as those used in our previous resting‐state fMRI study using HDBR intervention in standard ambient air (Cassady et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectivity based models can produce behavior, which is an essential requirement for any neural model of cognition (van der Velde and de Kamps 2015). Estimation of effective connectivity supports the inference of causal relationships and directional information flow, and may provide insights into the interactive dynamics in normal (Astolfi et al 2005;Bitan et al 2005;Kundu et al 2013;Wang and Zhu 2016;Zeng et al 2016) or disordered (Baccala et al 2004;Behnam et al 2008;Cadotte et al 2009;Coben et al 2013Coben et al , 2014Gravier et al 2016;Kundu et al 2013;Liu et al 2012;Protopapa et al 2016) brain functions. Among many definitions of causality (Atmanspacher and Rotter 2008), there are two important aspects that are of practical relevance: (1) temporal precedence: causes precede their consequences; (2) physical influence: manipulation of the causes changes their consequences (Valdes-Sosa et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%