2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-019-01217-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defaulting firms and systemic risks in financial networks: a normative approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li and He (2016) maintained this point of view in analyzing the impact of default probability on the loss distribution of defaults in IMM. Moreover, several studies identifying the set of defaulted banks during a clearing process implicitly addressed the significant role of contagion in default spreads (Houy et al., 2019; Kusnetsov & Veraart, 2019; Rogers & Veraart, 2013), although they focused only on stylized principles of insolvency law (Eisenberg & Noe, 2001). They all suggested that the higher contagion risk increases the likelihood of new defaults in the network.…”
Section: Results Of Integrative Review: the Affecting Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and He (2016) maintained this point of view in analyzing the impact of default probability on the loss distribution of defaults in IMM. Moreover, several studies identifying the set of defaulted banks during a clearing process implicitly addressed the significant role of contagion in default spreads (Houy et al., 2019; Kusnetsov & Veraart, 2019; Rogers & Veraart, 2013), although they focused only on stylized principles of insolvency law (Eisenberg & Noe, 2001). They all suggested that the higher contagion risk increases the likelihood of new defaults in the network.…”
Section: Results Of Integrative Review: the Affecting Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%