Defeating Unconscious Bias: The Role of a Structured, Reflective, and Interactive Workshop

Abstract

Background Unconscious or implicit biases are universal and detrimental to health care and the learning environment but can be corrected. Historical interventions used the Implicit Association Test (IAT), which may have limitations. Objective We determined the efficacy of an implicit bias training without using the IAT. Methods From April 2019 to June 2020, a 90-minute educational workshop was attended by students, residents, and faculty. The curriculum included an interactive unconscious biases presentation, videoclips using vignettes to demonstrate workplace impact of unconscious biases with strategies to counter, and reflective group discussions. The evaluation included pre- and postintervention surveys. Participants were shown images of 5 individuals and recorded first impressions regarding trustworthiness and presumed profession to unmask implicit bias. Results Of approximately 273 participants, 181 were given the survey, of which 103 (57%) completed it with significant increases from pre- to postintervention assessments for perception scores (28.87 [SEM 0.585] vs 32.73 [0.576], P < .001) and knowledge scores (5.68 [0.191] vs 7.22 [0.157], P < .001). For a White male physician covered in tattoos, only 2% correctly identified him as a physician, and 60% felt he was untrustworthy. For a smiling Black female astronaut, only 13% correctly identified her as an astronaut. For a brooding White male serial killer, 50% found him trustworthy. Conclusions An interactive unconscious bias workshop, performed without the use of an IAT, was associated with increases in perceptions and knowledge regarding implicit biases. The findings also confirmed inaccurate first impression stereotypical assumptions based on ethnicity, outward appearances, couture, and media influences.

Implementation of an unconscious bias course for the National Research Mentoring Network

“…Recently, an interactive workshop on implicit biases was evaluated for medical students, residents, and faculty. The study found significant improvements in knowledge and perceptions on bias [ 33 ]. A workshop on implicit biases regarding Hispanic patients was tested among first year medical students, and found improvement in implicit association tests among some of the students [ 34 ].…”

Implementing pathways to anesthesiology: Promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and success

“…Implement specialized anti-bias training for those involved in the recruitment, interviewing, evaluation, and selection processes, in addition to the general anti-bias and cultural humility education that should exist at any institution 93. These training sessions should ideally be interactive, practical, expert-led, and tailored for the specific context or practice; simple click-through, self-study modules are not enough 94…”

Countering Bias in Assessment

“…Bias affects our perceptions of another's knowledge, ability, professionalism, and readiness for independent practice. 2 Over repeated assessments, these biases can result in an amplification cascade, 1 a phenomenon in which small differences in assessed performance lead to larger differences in grades and selection for awards, favoring well-represented individuals and hindering underrepresented in medicine (UiM) trainees in achieving training success. 3 Eliminating harmful effects of cognitive biases requires a multilevel response.…”

“…5 How You Can Start TODAY Training should facilitate faculty recognition of their own biases, teach faculty to recognize biased language in their own narrative assessments, and provide skills to counter biased thinking. 2 Create an awareness of how bias influences trainee assessment and the significance of the amplification cascade. 4.…”