Defeatism Defeated

Baker-Hytch, Max; Benton, Matthew A.

doi:10.1111/phpe.12056

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

E → K and Cases Of Stubborn Belief And Misleading Evidence1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2016

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article8

Book2

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent9

Authors

Journals

Cited by 32 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Anti‐defeat views have been defended in Greco ; Lasonen‐Aarnio , forthcoming; Hawthorne and Srinivasan ; Baker‐Hytch and Benton ; and Beddor .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What is Epistemic Blame?

Brown

2018

Nous

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Anti‐defeat views have been defended in Greco ; Lasonen‐Aarnio , forthcoming; Hawthorne and Srinivasan ; Baker‐Hytch and Benton ; and Beddor .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What is Epistemic Blame?

Brown

2018

Nous

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Indeed, the issue (e.g., the possibility of the defeat of knowledge in the presence of new misleading evidence) is controversial (cf. Lasonen‐Aarnio, ; Baker‐Hytch and Benton, ). Given the controversy, and given that the possibility of defeat is essential for Littlejohn's counter‐argument, it is not clear that we should endorse Littlejohn's line of argument.…”

Section: E → K and Cases Of Stubborn Belief And Misleading Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Common Sense and Evidence: Some Neglected Arguments in Favour of E=K

Logins

2016

Theoria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For criticisms, see Williamson, ; Lasonen‐Aarnio, ; and especially Baker‐Hytch and Benton, . See Horowitz, , for replies to some of these criticisms and also Christensen, .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Use Cognitive Faculties You Never Knew You Had

Moon

2018

Pacific Philosophical Qtr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Norman forms the belief that the president is in New York by way of a clairvoyance faculty he doesn’t know he has. Many agree that his belief is unjustified but disagree about why it is unjustified. I argue that the lack of justification cannot be explained by a higher‐level evidence requirement on justification, but it can be explained by a no‐defeater requirement. I then explain how you can use cognitive faculties you don’t know you have. Lastly, I use lessons from the foregoing to compare Norman's belief, formed by clairvoyance, with Sally's theistic belief, formed by a sensus divinitatis.

show abstract

Defeatism Defeated

Cited by 32 publications

References 49 publications

What is Epistemic Blame?

What is Epistemic Blame?

Common Sense and Evidence: Some Neglected Arguments in Favour of E=K

How to Use Cognitive Faculties You Never Knew You Had

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About