1999
DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1998.7649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect 3 Blocks of Symmetric Group Algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These are largely concerned with comparing the decomposition numbers for blocks forming a [3 : κ]-pair. The results are largely the same as those in [13], but we are able to give quicker proofs using the modular branching rules.…”
Section: Blocks Of Small Weightsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are largely concerned with comparing the decomposition numbers for blocks forming a [3 : κ]-pair. The results are largely the same as those in [13], but we are able to give quicker proofs using the modular branching rules.…”
Section: Blocks Of Small Weightsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In this section we define some notation for partitions in blocks of weight 3; this is similar to the notation used by Martin and Russell [13], but we use the numbering of runners described in §1. 1.6.…”
Section: Notation For Blocks Of Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S. Martin [18] conjectured that the principal indecomposable modules in a weight w p-block of symmetric group algebra with w < p have a common radical length 2w + 1; this is clear for w = 0 and w = 1, and J. Scopes [24] proves the case of w = 2, while Martin and the second author [19,20] (rad ∆,ν,λ (v))…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin and Russell [15] initiated the study of blocks of weight 3 with the construction of the Ext 1 -quiver of the principal block of S 3p where p 5. They also attempted to show that the decomposition numbers for a weight 3 block of Abelian defect are at most 1 [16], but mistakes have been found in their proof. The complete proof was finally announced by the first author of the present paper in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%