2014
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/075013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect and structural imperfection effects on the electronic properties of BiTeI surfaces

Abstract: The surface electronic structure of the narrow-gap seminconductor BiTeI exhibits a large Rashba-splitting which strongly depends on the surface termination. Here we report on a detailed investigation of the surface morphology and electronic properties of cleaved BiTeI single crystals by scanning tunneling microscopy, photoelectron spectroscopy (ARPES, XPS), electron diffraction (SPA-LEED) and density functional theory calculations. Our measurements confirm a previously reported coexistence of Te-and I-terminat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that negative voltages refer to tunneling from the sample to the tip, thus reflecting the occupied DOS of the sample as being also accessed by ARPES spectra. Coexisting Te-and I-terminations are visible as reported earlier [20][21][22][23]. The outer part of the image shows the corresponding dI /dV map of the surface within the two white dashed lines.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that negative voltages refer to tunneling from the sample to the tip, thus reflecting the occupied DOS of the sample as being also accessed by ARPES spectra. Coexisting Te-and I-terminations are visible as reported earlier [20][21][22][23]. The outer part of the image shows the corresponding dI /dV map of the surface within the two white dashed lines.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Surprisingly, for BiTeI only one cutoff could be observed in our spectra despite the presence of Teand I-terminated surface areas. The Te and I domains of BiTeI are in order of 100 nm [23] and maybe small enough to result in a mixed work function when measured by secondary electron cutoff technique. The corresponding work function of 5.2 eV is given in brackets in Table I and lies in between the values found for Te-and I-terminated surface areas by STM [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an antisite atom A has been introduced in a layer B ( A B ) without leaving behind a vacancy in the layer A or creating the B A antisite which would correspond to the site exchange between atoms A and B . However, in the experimental situation the defects may be complex, as, e.g., a vacancy-antisite pair, proposed for the undoped BiTeI(0001) surface 35 . Moreover it is not excluded that other complex defects, which have not been observed for the undoped BiTeI case are enabled to form due to V doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARPES and structural investigations show that the surface electronic structure of BiTeI depends sensitively on the termination and extrinsic and intrinsic defects. Fiedler et al [87] point out that bulk stacking faults that invert the order of the stacking sequence can lead to two coexisting domains with different surface terminations. DFT calculations show that the Te-terminated surface of BiTeBr gives rise to a giant Rashba parameter of α ∼ 2 R eVÅ [86].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%