“…To meet the targeted 10% solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency for practical implementation of the hydrogen economy, the ideal band gap E g ∼ 2.3 and ∼1.8/1.2 eV for the single and paired light absorbers in the Schottky- and tandem-type photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells, respectively, has been theoretically derived. − Cuprous oxide (Cu 2 O) has in this regard long been spotlighted as a promising candidate in relevant research fields in view of the characteristic direct band gap E g = 1.9–2.2 eV being close to those estimations and more importantly allowing the generation of the maximum photocurrent density amounting to 14.7 mA cm –2 under one sun illumination. − In a majority of the Cu 2 O-based PEC devices reported to date, Cu 2 O was mostly prepared via an electrochemical approach and directly deposited on a transparent conductive oxide (TCO)-coated glass substrate, between which the interface has, however, been frequently identified as a Schottky in lieu of an Ohmic junction. − ,− This is attributed to the large mismatch in the work function (Φ) of TCO, which has been reported to be Φ = 4.8–5.0 eV for fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) and Φ = 4.1–5.2 eV for tin-doped indium oxide (ITO), with respect to that of either p- or n-type Cu 2 O. ,,− In consequence, the severe charge accumulation at the Cu 2 O/TCO interface has been frequently stressed by previous junction studies to significantly undermine the charge collection efficiency and thereby the overall device performance. ,,− ,− To address this issue, nickel oxide (NiO)-based materials including copper–nickel mixed oxide (CuO/NiO), copper-doped nickel oxide (Cu/NiO), and so forth have been put forward by Grätzel, Gong, and others very recently as alternative contacts to p-Cu...…”