2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2022.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect-controlled Ar40 diffusion-domain structure of white micas from high-resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 99 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our interpretation is that the micas with Xcel > 0.3 are porphyroclasts inherited from an early event (≥ 600 Ma) while the younger age of the Xcel < 0.2 micas record a younger fluid-rock interaction event responsible for the growth of secondary white micas and chlorite between 250 and 350 °C during top to the east deformation. That temperature is lower than the closure temperature of white micas for the K/Ar system of 400-445 °C (Harrison et al, 2009) and recently revised theoretical and empirical estimates (Nteme et al, 2022(Nteme et al, , 2023 implying that the 15.4 ± 0.2 Ma (middle Miocene) age correspond to white mica crystallization, not cooling.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our interpretation is that the micas with Xcel > 0.3 are porphyroclasts inherited from an early event (≥ 600 Ma) while the younger age of the Xcel < 0.2 micas record a younger fluid-rock interaction event responsible for the growth of secondary white micas and chlorite between 250 and 350 °C during top to the east deformation. That temperature is lower than the closure temperature of white micas for the K/Ar system of 400-445 °C (Harrison et al, 2009) and recently revised theoretical and empirical estimates (Nteme et al, 2022(Nteme et al, , 2023 implying that the 15.4 ± 0.2 Ma (middle Miocene) age correspond to white mica crystallization, not cooling.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 87%