“…The definiteness condition A together with the fact that I 2 − A ( t ) is invertible now guarantees the existence of a unique solution for (2.4). If \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$z \in {\mathbb {C}}\backslash {\mathbb {R}}$\end{document}, G. Ren and Y. Shi 26 have shown that the dimension of the defect space of H 0 and also of H 00 are equal to the number of linearly independent square summable solutions of (1.1) or (2.4). Assume that the defect index of H 0 are equal, that is, \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\textrm {def}\, H_{0} = (n,n)$\end{document}, where 2 ⩽ n ⩽ 4, then H 0 has selfadjoint extension subspace in \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$L_{W}^{2}(I)\times L_{W}^{2}(I)$\end{document} denoted by H if there exists matrices \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$\alpha _{1}, \alpha _{2} \in {\mathbb {C}}^{2\times 2}$\end{document} such that with Φ a = (( y 1 , y 2 )( a − 1)) 2 × 2 and Φ ∞ defined in a similar way though with the boundary condition fixed at limiting point, that is, as t → ∞.…”