2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.411959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defect states in monolayer hexagonal BN: A comparative DFT and DFT-1/2 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even CVD-grown MLs, featuring large homogeneous domains, display emitters at a wavelength of 575 ± 15 nm, with no need for ion irradiation or annealing in argon [156]. The presence of carbon during other growth techniques (metallorganic vapour phase epitaxy and molecular beam epitaxy) appears to be crucial for the appearance of SPEs (as shown in figure 3(a)), with the V B C − N defect as a possible candidate [157], confirming several theoretical studies on the role of carbon [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167], which also attributed the UV emission at 4.1 eV to the carbon dimer defect C B C N [168]. Control over the emitters wavelength has been partially achieved (i) via the Stark effect, tuning the emission with an out-of-plane electric field applied by graphene gates [169]; (ii) with a four-electrode device controlling both the amplitude and the direction of the electric field, leading to a Stark shift (visible in figure 3(b)) four times larger than the full width at half maximum (FWHM) at RT [170]; or (iii) by placing the emitters between an indium tin oxide coated glass slide and a conductive AFM tip [171].…”
Section: Hbnsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Even CVD-grown MLs, featuring large homogeneous domains, display emitters at a wavelength of 575 ± 15 nm, with no need for ion irradiation or annealing in argon [156]. The presence of carbon during other growth techniques (metallorganic vapour phase epitaxy and molecular beam epitaxy) appears to be crucial for the appearance of SPEs (as shown in figure 3(a)), with the V B C − N defect as a possible candidate [157], confirming several theoretical studies on the role of carbon [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167], which also attributed the UV emission at 4.1 eV to the carbon dimer defect C B C N [168]. Control over the emitters wavelength has been partially achieved (i) via the Stark effect, tuning the emission with an out-of-plane electric field applied by graphene gates [169]; (ii) with a four-electrode device controlling both the amplitude and the direction of the electric field, leading to a Stark shift (visible in figure 3(b)) four times larger than the full width at half maximum (FWHM) at RT [170]; or (iii) by placing the emitters between an indium tin oxide coated glass slide and a conductive AFM tip [171].…”
Section: Hbnsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The efficiency is several orders of magnitude higher than using GW quasi-particle energies. Korkmaz et al [285] investigated the defects in monolayer hexagonal BN using LDA/GGA as well as DFT-1/2, including carbon impurities substituting for B or N, nitrogen vacancies as well as Stone-Wales defects. The carbon self-energy potential was from mixed −1/4s and −1/4p, thus pointing to −1/2 e charge stripping, in consistent with previous works and arguments [16,17,133].…”
Section: Defect Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%