1976
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-31-3-383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defective-Interfering Particles of Semliki Forest Virus: Structural Differences between Standard Virus and Defective-Interfering Particles

Abstract: SUMMARYSerial passaging of Semliki Forest virus in BHK cells at a constant input multiplicity of 5o p.f.u./cell resulted in a 4 log10 drop in the yield of infectious virus by passage 9. An interference analysis showed that this drop was due to the presence of defective-interfering (DI) particles. Attempts were made to separate the DI particles from standard virus by equilibrium and velocity centrifugation. Only equilibrium centrifugation on CsC1 resolved the DI particles (identified by interference analyses) f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…wt. (0.8 x 106) ofDI RNA of the same virus at passage 8 (Bruton & Kennedy, 1976), suggesting that the entire genome is required for interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…wt. (0.8 x 106) ofDI RNA of the same virus at passage 8 (Bruton & Kennedy, 1976), suggesting that the entire genome is required for interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has to be compared with the six high m.o.i. passages of SFV, also in BHK cells, which were required before Bruton & Kennedy (1976) had evidence of DI virus production from the decreased yield of infectious virus. It also emphasizes the importance of prolonged incubation in the generation of DI virus noted for Sindbis virus (King et aL, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An ELISA based on that of Voller et al (1976) was used to measure anti-SFV IgG levels. Virus was purified by ultrafiltration and sucrose gradient centrifugation as described by Bruton & Kennedy (1976). A single sucrose gradient was run and the buffer used throughout was 0.05 M-Tris, 0.1 M-NaC1, 0-1 mM-EDTA, 200 mu-glycine, pH 7.4, containing no foetal calf serum (FCS).…”
Section: Micementioning
confidence: 99%