2010
DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2010.513605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defending the Nation? Maintaining Turkey's Narrative of the Armenian Genocide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This "silencing of the past" and erasing of memory includes the ongoing use by Turkish officials of "the national educational system to shape citizens' understanding of the 'Armenian question' and to bolster domestic support for its official position." (Dixon 2010).…”
Section: Rewriting the Curriculum: The Armenian Genocidementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This "silencing of the past" and erasing of memory includes the ongoing use by Turkish officials of "the national educational system to shape citizens' understanding of the 'Armenian question' and to bolster domestic support for its official position." (Dixon 2010).…”
Section: Rewriting the Curriculum: The Armenian Genocidementioning
confidence: 95%
“…These institutions p rovide information that sustains the dominant confl ict-supportive narrative while suppressing information that may challenge it. This is done, for instance, by selecting friendly agents for the dissemination of information, by establishing a central organization to oversee the dissemination of the offi cial confl ictsupportive narratives, and by preventing journalists or monitoring NGOs from entering particular areas of confl ict-related action (Dixon 2010 ). The Russians' method for dealing with the local media during the second Russia-Chechnya War illustrates this mechanism's employment.…”
Section: Societal Mechanisms As Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State offi cials had access to such documents but only to search for documents that supported the Turkish "no genocide" narrative. In 1985, the archives were partially opened, but even then, access granted to the documents was highly selective (Dixon 2010 ;Safarian 1999 ). 4.…”
Section: Societal Mechanisms As Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These institutions p rovide information that sustains the dominant confl ict-supportive narrative while suppressing information that may challenge it. This is done, for instance, by selecting friendly agents for the dissemination of information, by establishing a central organization to oversee the dissemination of the offi cial confl ictsupportive narratives, and by preventing journalists or monitoring NGOs from entering particular areas of confl ict-related action (Dixon 2010 ). The Russians' method for dealing with the local media during the second RussiaChechnya War illustrates this mechanism's employment.…”
Section: Societal Mechanisms As Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%