2010
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining a standard metric for electricity savings

Abstract: The growing investment by governments and electric utilities in energy efficiency programs highlights the need for simple tools to help assess and explain the size of the potential resource. One technique that is commonly used in this effort is to characterize electricity savings in terms of avoided power plants, because it is easier for people to visualize a power plant than it is to understand an abstraction such as billions of kilowatt-hours. Unfortunately, there is no standardization around the characteris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying our median whole-building energy-saving value (i.e., not best practices) to the stock of US nonresidential buildings corresponds to an annual energysaving potential of $30 billion by the year 2030, which in turn corresponds to annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 340 Mt of CO 2 each year (or 110 "Rosenfelds", per Koomey et al (2010)). …”
Section: The National-scale Potential For Commissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying our median whole-building energy-saving value (i.e., not best practices) to the stock of US nonresidential buildings corresponds to an annual energysaving potential of $30 billion by the year 2030, which in turn corresponds to annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 340 Mt of CO 2 each year (or 110 "Rosenfelds", per Koomey et al (2010)). …”
Section: The National-scale Potential For Commissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, a wide range of literature [40] has viewed energy effi ciency as a generous and relatively inexpensive resource of energy. Levine et al [41] concluded that buildings house a signifi cant amount of energy effi ciency potential, which can be realised using existing energy effi ciency technologies. Hence, reuse of historic buildings can and should be undertaken to extend building life and better capture the energy savings available through newer technologies.…”
Section: The Emerging Area Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with Koomey et al 2010, we use the unit of Rosenfeld for denoting energy savings. One Rosenfeld=3TWh/year, or approximately one 500MW (i.e.medium power plant).…”
Section: Cost To Consumer Of Conserved Electricity (Ccec) Versus Roommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…about 123 medium sized power plants(or 369 TWh/year). (Koomey et al 2010) If the costs of peak power, backup generation or power outages are included in the consideration of cost-effectiveness, due to the high peak coincidence of Room AC use, the ESEER levels that would be considered to be cost effective would be even higher than those shown in column D, along with correspondingly higher savings to those bearing these costs (i.e.taxpayers, other ratepayers etc. )…”
Section: W/w Is Cost Effective Leading Tomentioning
confidence: 99%