Defining a Standard Set of Patient Centered Outcomes for Patients With Lung Cancer

Mak, Kimberley S.; Bommel, A.C.M. van; Stowell, Caleb; Abrahm, Janet L.; Baker, Matthew; Baldotto, Clarissa; Baldwin, David R; Borthwick, D.; Carbone, David P.; Chen, A.B.; Haswell, Tom; Koczywas, Marianna; Kozower, Benjamin D.; Mehran, Reza J.; Schramel, Franz M.N.H.; Senan, Suresh; Stirling, Robert; Meerbeeck, Jan P. van; Wouters, M.; Peake, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.1575

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several internationally validated outcome indicators, including patientreported outcome data that are important to evaluate the results of the care delivered could not be measured. International quality improvement initiatives recommend to primary collect information on outcomes that matter for the patient [26,27], and this has already been successfully implemented for lung cancer in the Netherlands [28]. Prospective data collection on patient-reported outcomes and patientreported experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) would thus certainly be an asset for future quality assessments in Belgium.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of care and variability in lung cancer management across Belgian hospitals: a population-based study using routinely available data

Gendt¹,

Verleye

Robays

et al. 2018

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of care and variability in lung cancer management across Belgian hospitals: a population-based study using routinely available data

Gendt¹,

Verleye

Robays

et al. 2018

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, ICHOM's outcomes for coronary artery disease (CAD) and lung cancer have been published. In CAD working group, they focused on short-term (hospitalization, 30 days post-discharge) and long-term (1-year and 5-year survival) outcomes [10,11]. Besides clinically measured outcomes, they also included patients' quality of life through several instruments (Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Rose Dyspnea Score, and Patient Health Questionnaire).…”

Section: Review Health and Outcomes Are Set For Specific Medical Condmentioning

confidence: 99%

Redefining Health: Implication for Value-Based Healthcare Reform

Putera¹

2017

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health definition consists three domains, namely physicial, mental and social health, that should be prioritized in delivering healthcare. The emergence of chronic diseases in the aging populations has been a barrier to the realization of healthier society. The value-based healthcare concept seems in line with the true health objectives: increasing value. Value is created from health outcomes which matter to patient relative to cost of achieving those outcomes. The health outcomes should include all domain of health in a full cycle of care. To implement value-based healthcare, transformations need to be done by both health providers and patients: establishing true health outcomes, strenghtening primary care, buidling integrated health system, implementing appropriate health payment scheme that promote value and reduce moral hazards, enabling health information technology, and policy that fits well with community.

show abstract

“…Sommige kwaliteitsregistratie-initiatieven, zoals die van Santeon [12] en het International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (www.ichom.org), richten zich vooral op uitkomstindicatoren en de bijbehorende casemixvariabelen [13,14]. Nadeel van deze focus is dat veel uitkomsten, zoals recidieven of overleving, pas na langere tijd beschikbaar zijn en vaak multifactorieel en multi-institutioneel tot stand komen, waardoor ze minder informatief zijn voor de individuele zorgaanbieder.…”

Section: Proces En Uitkomstindicatorenunclassified

Kwaliteitsregistraties volgens het principe van ‘clinical auditing’

Wouters

2017

Tijdschr Urol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Samenvatting Wetenschappelijke verenigingen van medisch specialisten hebben de afgelopen jaren kwaliteitsregistraties geïnitieerd die zijn opgezet volgens het clinical-auditing principe. Het primaire doel van deze landelijke audits is het verbeteren van zorguitkomsten, door behandelaars te voorzien van spiegelinformatie, waarmee zij de kwaliteit van hun zorgproces kunnen monitoren en verbeteren. Directe betrokkenheid van dokters bij de opzet en uitvoering van de audit, tijdige terugkoppeling van kwaliteitsaspecten die door henzelf belangrijk worden gevonden en het proactief volgen van ontwikkelingen in de zorg, zijn essentieel voor het succes van kwaliteitsregistraties. De mogelijkheid voor behandelaars om resultaten te monitoren, richtlijnnavolging en de introductie van de mogelijkheid om nieuwe technieken te evalueren en met kwaliteitsintiatieven hun uitkomsten te verbeteren, heeft tot substantiële vermindering van morbiditeit en mortaliteit geleid op diverse chirurgische terreinen. Registratie aan de bron, structurele financiering en goede afspraken over transparantie, zijn essentieel om clinical auditing te bestendigen als krachtig instrument in het kwaliteitsbeleid van wetenschappelijke verenigingen.

show abstract

Defining a Standard Set of Patient Centered Outcomes for Patients With Lung Cancer

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Quality of care and variability in lung cancer management across Belgian hospitals: a population-based study using routinely available data

Quality of care and variability in lung cancer management across Belgian hospitals: a population-based study using routinely available data

Redefining Health: Implication for Value-Based Healthcare Reform

Kwaliteitsregistraties volgens het principe van ‘clinical auditing’

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About