Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2790994.2791002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining accuracy in the use of Kinect v2 for exercise monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be argued that there was a low consistency between the two systems in the study. Woolford et al [24] used the Qualisys ProReflex system and reflective markers to assess Microsoft Kinect v2 accuracy for monitoring physical activities. However, Qualisys ProReflex cameras emit 880 nm strobe, which might still contribute as an active noise source in the Kinect v2 recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It might be argued that there was a low consistency between the two systems in the study. Woolford et al [24] used the Qualisys ProReflex system and reflective markers to assess Microsoft Kinect v2 accuracy for monitoring physical activities. However, Qualisys ProReflex cameras emit 880 nm strobe, which might still contribute as an active noise source in the Kinect v2 recordings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies evaluated the validity and reliability of the Microsoft Kinect v2 skeleton estimation using markerbased motion capture systems as a golden standard system [19]- [27], none of these studies investigated or reported any distortion in the estimated joint positions. The majority of these studies employed Vicon [19], [20], [33], [34], [21], [26]- [32], BTS SMART-DX [22], [35], or Qualisys [24], [36], [37] motion capture systems that all utilize reflective markers. Microsoft Kinect v2 estimates the depth information based on time-of-flight (ToF) principle using infrared (IR) emitters and detector [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human body data can be obtained with sufficient accuracy without contact with a special marker on the human body. Woolford [17] suggests that such a system, the Kinect V2, may be useable compare to a traditional clinical system, in a healthcare environment because the target person does not need to put on any marker device so that tracking would be done without making physical contact with that person. That is, the skeleton can be recognized cheaply with sufficient accuracy using Kinect V2.…”
Section: Kinect V2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camera-based tracking systems are accurate enough to recognize gestures and body movements (e.g., Microsoft Kinect v.2 has an accuracy of +=1cm [14]). They are not designed, however, to preserve identities -unless they are used in combination with facerecognition algorithms.…”
Section: Identity-preserving Tracking For Multiple Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%