2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12646-011-0067-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining and Measuring Self-Concept Change

Abstract: The self-concept and the manners by which it changes are two of the most important, and challenging, areas of psychological study. In this review, we define the self-concept as a multifaceted psychological construct, composed of a variety of characteristics. People with low self-esteem, incremental theorists, self-monitors, and people with a high uncertainty orientation and relational selfconstrual are mentioned as some of the types of people who are likely to undergo change. Various approaches to measuring th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Change in the self-concept is often not intentional but occurs on an implicit and involuntary level, and seems to be multifaceted including social, developmental, biological, and cultural aspects that are still under investigation (Gore & Cross, 2011). Within the clinical domain, the intentional induction of change specifically regarding the emotional evaluation of the self-concept content is the goal of several therapeutic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in the self-concept is often not intentional but occurs on an implicit and involuntary level, and seems to be multifaceted including social, developmental, biological, and cultural aspects that are still under investigation (Gore & Cross, 2011). Within the clinical domain, the intentional induction of change specifically regarding the emotional evaluation of the self-concept content is the goal of several therapeutic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to the studies' diverse methodologies and research aims though. Examining personality facets with a higher variability, e.g., facets of the self (Shavelson et al, 1976 ; Gore and Cross, 2011 ), is probably more suitable in intervention studies. These studies though were not included in our review, as they did not explicitly claim to assess personality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, high selfmonitors' absorption of the charismatic leader's displays of positive affect (i.e., the emotional contagion) may be a superficial imitation of the leader's charismatic emotional cues, because high selfmonitors tend to simulate their emotional expressions without actually feeling them (Brotheridge and Lee, 2002;Diefendorff et al, 2005). Moreover, the tendency of high self-monitors to alter their behaviors to fit the situational demands harms the consolidation of a stable identity (Gore and Cross, 2011), and thus harms their ability to communicate a consistent vision on key issues (Day et al, 2002). These, in turn, are associated with high self-monitors being perceived as inconsistent, self-promotional, and lacking personal integrity, and as not accurately and consistently reflecting their authentic selves (Bedeian and Day, 2004), thereby, decreasing the perception of the higher self-monitoring individual as authentically charismatic.…”
Section: The Flow Of Charisma: Self-monitoring As a Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%