2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining efficient policies in a general equilibrium model: a multi-objective approach

Abstract: Article history: Available online xxxx JEL classification: C61 C68 D78 Keywords:Public policy Multicriteria decision making Computable general equilibrium model efficient frontier a b s t r a c t Macroeconomic policy makers are typically concerned with several indicators of economic performance. We thus propose to tackle the design of macroeconomic policy using Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques. More specifically, we employ Multiobjective Programming (MP) to seek so-called efficient policies. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, CP represents a good surrogate of the utility maximum for rational agents. This argument is corroborated by subsequent works on macroeconomics (André et al, 2008;Andre and Cardenete, 2009), microeconomics (Ballestero and Romero, 1998;Ballestero, 2000;, and portfolio selection (Ballestero, 1998;Ballestero and Pla-Santamaria, 2004). In the context of SVE, we rely on CP to study compromise solutions from an external analyst point of view when social and economic criteria are in conflict, i.e., when economic and social achievement is out of the "sweet-spot".…”
Section: An Axiomatic Approach To Share Valuementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Thus, CP represents a good surrogate of the utility maximum for rational agents. This argument is corroborated by subsequent works on macroeconomics (André et al, 2008;Andre and Cardenete, 2009), microeconomics (Ballestero and Romero, 1998;Ballestero, 2000;, and portfolio selection (Ballestero, 1998;Ballestero and Pla-Santamaria, 2004). In the context of SVE, we rely on CP to study compromise solutions from an external analyst point of view when social and economic criteria are in conflict, i.e., when economic and social achievement is out of the "sweet-spot".…”
Section: An Axiomatic Approach To Share Valuementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, since we have intentionally allowed for a very large range of policy combinations, it is not possible (not useful) to test all of them. Following the approach suggested in André and Cardenete (2009a;2009b), we focus on the set of so-called efficient policies. Following the classical Pareto criterion, we say that a policy combination x providing the objective values (u, π ) is efficient if there is not another feasible policy x providing (u , π ) such that, either u ≤ u and π < π or u < u and π ≤ π.…”
Section: Unemployment Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since there is a virtually infinite number of policy mixes, we need a sensible criterion to determine which of them should be taken into account. Following André and Cardenete (2009a;2009b), we focus on so-called efficient policies, i.e. those policy mixes that are not Pareto-dominated from the point of view of the relevant policy objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%