2014
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Fat Necrosis in Plastic Surgery

Abstract: Based on the articles reviewed in this article, a more uniform definition needs to exist that is clearly defined in all articles that report on fat necrosis. The authors suggest defining fat necrosis as a palpable, discrete, and persistent subcutaneous firmness found postoperatively that measures at least 1 cm during physical examination. Fat necrosis can be identified and confirmed by imaging and histopathology or through intraoperative findings. The authors provide a classification system for fat necrosis th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minor clinically detectable areas between 1 and 3 cm were found in 3.4 percent of standardized DIEP flaps and 2.4 percent of abdominal perforator exchange flaps (Tables 3 and 6). 2,3,5,6,917…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minor clinically detectable areas between 1 and 3 cm were found in 3.4 percent of standardized DIEP flaps and 2.4 percent of abdominal perforator exchange flaps (Tables 3 and 6). 2,3,5,6,917…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat necrosis was defined as a palpable nodule greater than or equal to 1 cm according to the Rao grading system. 6…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fat necrosis incidence ranges from 5% to 35% (Kroll, 2000;Peeters, Nanhekhan, Van Ongeval, Fabre, & Vandevoort, 2009) and non-standardized definitions based combinations of clinical symptoms, signs, or imaging findings remain a challenge. (Rao & Saadeh, 2014) The flap periphery is typically affected, (Figus, Mosahebi, & Ramakrishnan, 2006) suggesting that distance from the vascular pedicle is a predisposing factor. Interestingly, medial row perforators are more likely to result in fat necrosis than lateral row perforators (24.5% vs. 8.2%; P < .001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Currently, there is no clear consensus on how fat necrosis is defined or classified. 18,19 Due to our multi- surgeon experience, we felt that this was our most objective data for analysis. While the data suggests that there is a difference in fat necrosis requiring excision between the two cohorts, the reason for the difference is less clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%