2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-015-9882-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Genera of New World Monkeys: The Need for a Critical View in a Necessarily Arbitrary Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the currently inflated taxonomy of New World primates should be fixed, and several proposed genera should be lumped into fewer ones. This process has already begun (e.g., Garbino 2015a, this study), but it is far from completion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, the currently inflated taxonomy of New World primates should be fixed, and several proposed genera should be lumped into fewer ones. This process has already begun (e.g., Garbino 2015a, this study), but it is far from completion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Clearly, the differences and phylogenetic split between the two lineages of capuchin monkeys should be recognized with Linnean nomenclature; however, the most suitable action to do so, at least provisionally, is to use Sapajus and Cebus as subgenera of Cebus . At least three reasons support this view, as follows (see also Voss et al 2014, Garbino 2015a):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generic name is an irreplaceable part of the Latin binomial attributed to all species in the Linnaean binomial, being the first identifiable entity (Dubois, 1988;Vences et al, 2013). The few publications on the genus concept (Dubois, 1988;Garbino, 2015b;Lemen & Freeman, 1984;Talavera, Lukhtanov, Pierce, & Vila, 2013) in contrast to the vast body of literature focusing on species and species concepts indicate how imperative is the discussion of a classification system that best conveys the evolutionary history of a higher-level taxon.…”
Section: Amazon Marmosetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of the divergence time as a key criterion for taxonomic classification in the genus level of Neotropical Primates has been discussed in recent publications (Garbino, ,b; Gutiérrez & Marinho‐Filho ). Accordingly, divergence time, as well as geographic distribution, is not a diagnostic character and should not be used as the sole criterion in the taxonomic classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%