2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Hand Stereotypies in Rett Syndrome: A Movement Disorders Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,[27][28][29] This discrepancy may be explained by the recently reported low interrater reliability of HS categories. 30 Extending the findings of a previous study evaluating RTT diagnostic criteria, 6 we found that in non-RTT MECP2-positive females not only is HS prevalence low but also HS frequency and mouthing, confirming the specificity of these features to RTT. Another observation with diagnostic implications is that, while HS presence is not required for the diagnosis of atypical RTT, HS were found to be both prevalent and severe in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,[27][28][29] This discrepancy may be explained by the recently reported low interrater reliability of HS categories. 30 Extending the findings of a previous study evaluating RTT diagnostic criteria, 6 we found that in non-RTT MECP2-positive females not only is HS prevalence low but also HS frequency and mouthing, confirming the specificity of these features to RTT. Another observation with diagnostic implications is that, while HS presence is not required for the diagnosis of atypical RTT, HS were found to be both prevalent and severe in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For the longitudinal analyses, the use of the month of the visit and age at assessment could have led to slight overfitting in the models; however, since the goal of the analyses was descriptive rather than predictive, there was little if any effect on the conclusions reached. Another limitation is the use of nomenclature and subjective reporting that may not be consistently used by clinicians and parents, 30 underscoring the need for standardization of terminology and methodologies. Our investigation may also be limited by the potential ceiling effect in the MBA measure of HS severity (HS frequency); the MBA has never been formally analyzed beyond face validity either.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical severity is worse in patients with decreased hand function, 10 and increases in bradykinesia and hypertonia are thought to have a role in hand functioning. As suggested by others, 17 hand stereotypies have a heterogenous phenotype. Hand mouthing and clapping/tapping were more common than hand wringing/washing, 10 but hand wringing was the most common hand stereotypy in another study 34 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As presented in Table 1, the 43 studies captured information across the movement disorder ecosystem in patients with RTT. About 42% of the studies used video observations to assess movement disorders 12,16–32 . Others used questionnaires as the primary assessment method 11,33–36 or as an adjunct with other methods 18 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downs et al (2014) reported an algorithm and toolkit for the management of hand stereotypies in individuals with Rett syndrome and a model for designing therapeutic strategies to improve hand function as a framework for evidence‐based practice. Dy et al (2017) also tried to define the types and features of hand stereotypies in Rett syndrome for their systematic assessment in observational and intervention studies. Despite these efforts, interventions to reduce stereotypic hand movements have not been systematised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%