2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2882244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining Hate Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hate speech has historically been an ambiguous term, with many interpretations in casual as well as legal usage (Sellars, 2016). It is frequently at the center of the "free speech" discourse, specifically concerning whether citizens have a right to free expression, and thus hate speech ought to be protected, or have certain categories of harmful speech off limits (Howard, 2019).…”
Section: Hate Speech Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hate speech has historically been an ambiguous term, with many interpretations in casual as well as legal usage (Sellars, 2016). It is frequently at the center of the "free speech" discourse, specifically concerning whether citizens have a right to free expression, and thus hate speech ought to be protected, or have certain categories of harmful speech off limits (Howard, 2019).…”
Section: Hate Speech Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulating online hate speech has been particularly difficult due to the lack of an existing international consensus on what defines online hate speech and what falls in the sphere of freedom of expression. 133 While the EU and major social media companies have issued a code of conduct to combat and prohibit online hate speech, the First Amendment in the United States has always protected hate speech. 134 In the United States, for example, there is no clear separation between hate speech and hate crime.…”
Section: The Conceptual Fluidity Of 'Online Hate Speech'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traits from hate speech was: 1) Targeting of a Group, or Individual as a Member of a Group; 2) Content in the Message that Expresses Hatred 3) The Speech Causes a Harm 4) The Speaker Intends Harm or Bad Activity 5) The Speech Incites Bad Actions Beyond the Speech Itself 6) The Speech is Either Public or Directed at a Member of the Group, 7) The Context Makes Violent Response Possible 8) The Speech Has No Redeeming Purpose. 19 A fairly comprehensive theoretical study; given the phobia's emergence after 9/11, it proves that Islamophobia is considered to lead to a kind of 'discrimination' or racial action. It is called racial, because Islam is often associated with 'Arabization'; especially, because physically all of its worship uses Arabic.…”
Section: Analyzing Islamophobia As Hate Speech: Al-attas' Views On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%