2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining high-risk patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison among different scoring systems and clinical definitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with advanced age increases the risk of early adverse outcomes in patients treated by pPCI, which is consistent with literature data [7,8,12]. Studies dealing with risk assessment and adverse events aft er pPCI using scoring systems [13][14][15][16] give age a signifi cant impact as predictor of early adverse outcome, which was confi rmed in a meta-analysis that dealt with the comparison of these studies [16]. On the other hand Teplitsky et al analysis showed that in patients older than 90 years, pPCI was associated with low mortality in clinically stable patients, while clinically unstable patients had much worse prognosis in a six-month followup [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…with advanced age increases the risk of early adverse outcomes in patients treated by pPCI, which is consistent with literature data [7,8,12]. Studies dealing with risk assessment and adverse events aft er pPCI using scoring systems [13][14][15][16] give age a signifi cant impact as predictor of early adverse outcome, which was confi rmed in a meta-analysis that dealt with the comparison of these studies [16]. On the other hand Teplitsky et al analysis showed that in patients older than 90 years, pPCI was associated with low mortality in clinically stable patients, while clinically unstable patients had much worse prognosis in a six-month followup [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our study showed that the mortality was recorded signifi cantly more in patients with creatinine clearance values less than 60 ccs/min, which represents an independent predictive factor of intrahospital mortality of these patients (Table 3) Our results indicate that hypotension is the factor of adverse prognosis, which may be explained by the higher incidence of heart failure (higher rate according to Killip) and cardiogenic shock in these patients, which represent negative prognostic factors. Th ese results are consistent with other studies [5,13,14,16].…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This variation is clinically relevant because, despite the decrease in mortality for myocardial infarction over time, 10 our ability as clinicians to identify patients at high risk of decompensation has not necessarily improved. 36 37 Thus, although inpatient care for STEMI patients may be safer overall, certain populations of patients may continue to be at risk, and efforts to reduce the number of STEMI patients who receive ICU care on average may place these patients at even higher risk in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%