2023
DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2022.414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Defining honeybee subspecies in an evolutionary context warrants strategized conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the optimal K value of 9, nine distinct populations were obtained, with one central ancestral group (referred to as Central), comprising two components and several peripheral groups, namely Aba (AB), Bomi (BM), Central (CT), Hainan (HN), Northeast (NE), Qinghai (QH), Taiwan (TW) and a subpopulation called Malay (ML) (Figure 5a and Figure S9A–C). This population structure is consistent with previous results using SNP data but a different reference genome (Ji et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2023). Then, we investigated the population structure based on SVs, which exhibited a finer population structure with an optimal K value of 10 (Figure 5b; Figure S10A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the optimal K value of 9, nine distinct populations were obtained, with one central ancestral group (referred to as Central), comprising two components and several peripheral groups, namely Aba (AB), Bomi (BM), Central (CT), Hainan (HN), Northeast (NE), Qinghai (QH), Taiwan (TW) and a subpopulation called Malay (ML) (Figure 5a and Figure S9A–C). This population structure is consistent with previous results using SNP data but a different reference genome (Ji et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2023). Then, we investigated the population structure based on SVs, which exhibited a finer population structure with an optimal K value of 10 (Figure 5b; Figure S10A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The population structure of A. cerana is composed of one central ancestral group and multiple peripheral groups that radiated from it (Ji et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2023). In this study, we generated a chromosome‐scale reference genome sequence for the ancestral group of A. cerana (named as HB to indicate samples were collected from the Hubei Province in China) by applying PacBio high‐fidelity (HiFi) sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi‐C) techniques (Figure 1a; Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation studies have shown that low-coverage sequencing across a larger number of individuals can yield more accurate estimates of many population parameters, despite genotype uncertainty (Alex Buerkle & Gompert, 2013; Fumagalli, 2013). This approach not only reduces sequencing costs but also allows for more representative sampling; thereby, genotype likelihood-based analyses have been increasingly used in conservation genomics projects to address questions related to population genetic structure, demographic and evolutionary history, phylogeny/species delimitation, mutation load, and the genomic basis of trait variation (e.g., giant water lily [Smith et al, 2022], honey bees [Qiu et al, 2023] reef-building corals [Cooke et al, 2020], Pacific salmon [Prince et al, 2017], Aldabra giant tortoises [Çilingir et al, 2022a; 2022b], setophaga warblers [Baiz et al, 2021], Seychelles paradise flycather brown hyenas [Westbury et al, 2018], polar bears [Liu et al, 2014], muskox [Pečnerová et al, 2024], African and Asiatic cheetahs [Prost et al, 2022], Eurasian lynx [Mueller et al, 2022]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were performed on those photographs using Fiji software (Schindelin et al, 2012) . For the standard morphometric analysis we measured: the intertegular distance (ID, (Cane, 1987) , hamuli number, cubital index (described in Qiu et al, 2023), and fourteen wing characters: forewing length (lfw), forewing width (wfw), length of cubital vein 1 & 2 (Cub1, Cub2), wing vein angles-A4, B4, D7, E9, G18, J16, K19, L13, N23, 026 (Ruttner, 1988).For the geometric morphometric analysis, 20 forewing landmarks were used (Ji et al, 2020). Images of the forewings were first digitized using tpsDig v2.0 and tpsUtil v1.40 (https://sbmorphometrics.org/) and then we obtained the two-dimensional landmark coordinates for further analysis.…”
Section: Morphometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%